Client Update: New Nova Scotia pension plan asset transfer regulations
Peter McLellan, QC and Level Chan
On November 29, 2017, the Nova Scotia Department of Finance and Treasury Board released new regulations with respect to asset transfers between pension plans that are effective November 28, 2017. The regulations apply to transfers of pension plan assets when there is a sale of business or an employer establishes a new plan to replace or succeed an existing one.
The regulations are similar to Ontario regulations with respect to asset transfers and provide for:
- Transfers will be in accordance with the agreement between employers or plan sponsors for the transfer of assets from the original plan to the successor plan;
- Prescribed notices to eligible and ineligible members, former members and retired members and other persons entitled to benefits as well as bargaining agents and advisory committees;
- Prescribed notices, information and forms to be provided to eligible members if the transfer agreement requires individual consent for transfer;
- Transfer of assets on a solvency (rather than going concern) basis. The solvency funded ratio of the successor plan after the transfer must be either (i) at least 100% (85% for sale of business transfers); or (ii) no more than 5% below the solvency funded ratios of each of the original plan and the successor plan before the transfer;
- Continuation of special payments until the transfer of assets;
- Transfer with respect to defined benefits is not authorized if the successor plan is permitted to reduce accrued pension benefits;
- The amount of a transferred member’s accrued pension benefits under the successor plan, excluding ancillary benefits, must equal at least 85% of their accrued pension benefits under the original pension plan, also excluding ancillary benefits, as of the effective date of the transfer of assets.
The regulations provide clarity in an area that was not covered when the current regulations were released in 2015.
Of note, there are also provisions with respect to the transfer from an existing Nova Scotia single employer defined benefit pension plan to an Ontario multi-employer targeted benefit pension plan. That transfer is subject to an agreement to transfer assets and individual consent of members prior to transfer of their benefits.
The foregoing is intended for general information only. If you have any questions, please contact our Pensions and Employee Benefits Group.
Archive
By Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…
Read MoreTHE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…
Read MoreBy Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…
Read MoreBy Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…
Read MoreIn preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…
Read MoreBy Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…
Read MoreBy Peter McLellan, QC In the 1970s the issue for employers was long hair and sideburns. In the 1980’s it was earrings for men. Today the employer’s concerns are with tattoos and facial piercings. What are…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor Introduction It sounds simple: Two disputing parties, hoping to resolve their disagreement without drawn-out court proceedings, will mutually agree to a settlement on clear terms; release each other from all claims; and move…
Read More2015 ends with changes in workplace laws that our region’s employers will want to be aware of moving into 2016. Some legislation has been proclaimed and is in force, some has passed and will be…
Read More