Skip to content

Court upholds mandatory vaccine policy – Placing employee on unpaid leave not constructive dismissal

Mark Tector and Ben Currie

While there have been a number of arbitration decisions on the subject, Parmar v Tribe Management Inc., 2022 BCSC 1675 appears to be the first reported civil court decision to consider whether placing a non-unionized employee on an unpaid leave of absence for failure to comply with a mandatory vaccination policy (“MVP”) is constructive dismissal.

Ultimately, the Court found that the MVP was a reasonable response to the COVID-19 pandemic and Ms. Parmar made the choice not to comply with it; therefore, she was not constructively dismissed.

One way constructive dismissal occurs is where an employer makes a single unilateral change that substantially alters an essential term of the employment contract. In this context, the Court determined this issue by considering whether Tribe Management Inc.’s (“Tribe”) unilateral decision to place Ms. Parmar on unpaid leave for failure to comply with the MVP was reasonable and justified.

Tribe provides condominium management services. Ms. Parmar was an accounting professional working for Tribe with nineteen (19) years of experience in the industry. Tribe notified its employees on October 5, 2021 of its MVP and required employees to be fully vaccinated by November 24, 2021. Of Tribe’s 200 employees, only Ms. Parmar and one other employee failed to comply by the deadline. She did not claim to have a medical or religious exemption.

Ms. Parmar did not consider herself an “anti-vaxxer”, but explained that she reviewed the literature and was skeptical of the efficacy and side effects of the available vaccines. She also described that her family members experienced several adverse symptoms from the vaccine.

Ms. Parmar proposed several alternatives including working entirely from home, or on a hybrid basis with controlled visits to the office to sign cheques. She also offered to undergo frequent testing, but Tribe reiterated that the only exceptions were for medical or religious accommodation. Ms. Parmar was placed on an unpaid leave for three (3) months from December 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022. On January 25, 2022, Tribe advised Ms. Parmar that she would remain on unpaid leave until she became vaccinated or the MVP was relaxed. Ms. Parmar announced her resignation the next day and considered her employment constructively dismissed.

The Court made the following findings in reaching its decision that the MVP was reasonable and that Ms. Parmar was not constructively dismissed:

  • The assessment of the reasonableness of the MVP must be considered based on the knowledge about the pandemic at the time it was implemented and in light of Tribe’s obligation to protect its employees and clients;
  • Interestingly, the Court took judicial notice that COVID-19 is potentially deadly, easily transmissible, symptoms vary by person, and that vaccines reduce the severity of symptoms and adverse outcomes despite not preventing infection or transmission;
  • The MVP reflected the employer’s statutory obligation to ensure the health and safety of all workers;
  • “Individual views of the appropriateness of the MVP do not undermine the reasonableness of the policy”;
  • Parmar’s employment contract expressly stated that she would comply with all of Tribe’s policies as amended at Tribe’s discretion, subject to the policies being lawful and reasonable;
  • Tribe did not intend to terminate Ms. Parmar’s employment as she was a valued employee and expected to return to her new role, which she was recently promoted into; and
  • Implementing a MVP was a reasonable policy choice for employers based on the extraordinary circumstance of the pandemic in October of 2021 into January of 2022 and was the prevailing approach at the time.

As the first reported decision on the enforceability of MVPs in the non-union context, this case is significant. While we will have to wait to see if other Courts in different provinces follow this approach, it is good news for other employers who have implemented MVPs, including MVPs which result in employees being placed on unpaid leaves.  It is also significant the Court took judicial notice that (1) COVID-19 is serious and potentially deadly; and (2) that vaccines are an important and effective tool in reducing the potential harm.

This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.



Search Archive

Generic filters


Navigating Canada’s economic sanctions against Russia

June 6, 2023

By Kim Walsh and Olivia Bungay Canadian sanctions targeting Russia in relation to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine were significantly expanded over the past year. The Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations impose sanctions on individuals…

Read More

Federal Government introduces amendments to expand the mandates of the two historic Atlantic Accord Acts to include offshore wind energy

June 1, 2023

David Randell, Sadira Jan, Robert Grant, K.C., Greg Moores, G. John Samms, and James Gamblin The recent tabling of federal legislation is an important step for offshore wind development in the offshore areas of Nova…

Read More

Newfoundland and Labrador adopts virtual Alternate Witnessing of Documents Act – for good this time!

June 1, 2023

By Joe Thorne and Megan Kieley Background During the COVID-19 public health emergency order in Newfoundland and Labrador, the government passed the Temporary Alternate Witnessing of Documents Act, which (as the name implies) temporarily permitted…

Read More

The great IP debate in Canada

May 31, 2023

By Daniela Bassan, K.C. Daniela Bassan, K.C. is a Partner and Practice Group Chair at the law firm of Stewart McKelvey (Canada) where she focuses on intellectual property and complex, multi-jurisdictional dispute resolution. The premise…

Read More

New Brunswick introduces prompt payment and adjudication legislation

May 24, 2023

By Conor O’Neil and Maria Cummings On May 9, 2023, two bills were introduced in the New Brunswick Legislature that could have material affects on the construction industry. Bills 41 and 42, of the current…

Read More

10 LMIA recruitment and advertising tips for employers looking to hire foreign workers

May 24, 2023

Author Sara Espinal Henao, an Immigration Lawyer in our Halifax office, will be speaking on a related panel, Labour Market Impact Assessments Overview and Current Trends, at the upcoming CBA Immigration Law Conference in Ottawa,…

Read More

Hiring Internationally in the Film & Television Industry: 5 Things you Should Know

May 23, 2023

Author Brendan Sheridan, an Immigration Lawyer in our Halifax Office, will be running a related webinar on May 30, 2023, Avoiding immigration bloopers: A webinar for the film & television industry, in partnership with Screen…

Read More

Whose information is it anyway? Implications of the York University decision on public and private sector privacy and confidentiality

May 19, 2023

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 12 By Charlotte Henderson Privacy and confidentiality requirements are some of the most important responsibilities of organizations today. An organization’s ability to properly manage information,…

Read More

Are Non-Disclosure Agreements on their way out?

May 15, 2023

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 12 By Hilary Newman & Jacob Zelman A non-disclosure agreement, or “NDA”, is a legal contract in which two or more persons agree to keep the…

Read More

The General Anti-Avoidance Rule: more changes coming in 2023

May 12, 2023

By Graham Haynes & Isaac McLellan  Introduction The Canadian federal budget was unveiled on Tuesday, March 28, 2023 (“Budget 2023”)1 , and proposes significant changes to the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (the “GAAR”) in Canadian tax…

Read More

Search Archive

Generic filters

Scroll To Top