Skip to content

Final report of advisory committee on open banking

Kevin Landry and Annelise Harnanan (summer student)

Recently, the Advisory Committee on Open Banking released the Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking, (“Report”) confirming its intention to implement a broader, more modernized open banking system in Canada and mapping out a plan to do so.

As with the recently proposed Retail Payment Activities Act (“RPAA”) discussed in our earlier client update, the Report introduces proposed new licensing requirements and an oversight regime for Financial Technology (“FinTech”) companies, however the Report pertains to governance of ‘Open Banking’ instead of payment services, and conceives of a regulatory system being put in place as early as January 2023.

Background – open banking

Open banking refers to a regulatory framework that would allow consumers and small businesses to securely transfer their financial data. With open banking, data can be efficiently and safely moved between financial institutions, such as banks, and third-party service providers, such as FinTech companies that, for example, provide budgeting or investing services.

According to the Report, Canadian consumers have already been transferring their financial data to third parties in order to access various financial management tools. However, a method used by many consumers to share their data online, called “screen scraping,” presents security and liability risks to consumers because they are required to share their banking login credentials with third-party service providers. In sharing their usernames and passwords with third parties, consumers may violate the terms of their service agreements with their banks, causing the risk of loss to shift to them without their knowledge. Open banking is seen as a way to address these risks.

Scope

If the Report’s recommendations are adopted, all federally-regulated banks would be required to participate in open banking. Provincially-regulated institutions, such as credit unions, would be able to join if so desired. Other entities, such as FinTech companies, would have to meet accreditation criteria and follow the other rules of the open banking system in order to participate.  All participants would be equally subject to data mobility requests, following consumer permission.

The Report proposes that the initial scope of the open banking system should cover data that has generally been available to consumers through online banking. This includes data from (1) chequing and savings accounts; (2) investment accounts that consumers can access through online banking; and (3) lending products such as lines of credit and credit cards. Derived data (data that has been analyzed or enhanced by financial institutions, such as internal credit risk assessments) is often proprietary and may be excluded from open banking.

It is also recommended that the initial phase of open banking be limited to “read access”, meaning consumers can grant third-party service providers the ability to receive their financial data, but not to edit this data on bank’s servers.

Governance

The Report recommends a phased approach to governance of the open banking system. For phase one, it is proposed that the government appoint an open banking lead who will be accountable to the Deputy Minister of Finance. This “lead” would work with industry experts and consumer representatives over an initial 18-month span to establish the following three foundational elements:

  1. Common rules for open banking participants that would replace the need for bilateral contracts and ensure consumer protection;
  2. An accreditation framework that allows third-party service providers to participate in the open banking system; and
  3. Technical specifications that would ensure the safe and efficient transfer of data and serve established policy objectives.

At the second phase, a “governance entity” would be established to manage the ongoing administration of the system. It is also recommended that the government consider which elements of the open banking system need to be codified in legislation.

Common rules

It is envisioned that the open banking lead will develop common rules to govern the participants of open banking, including banks and FinTech companies. The Report proposes that these rules address the allocation of liability, privacy (and consent) management, and the security of the financial data that is being transferred.

Accreditation

If the Report’s recommendations are followed, accreditation would be required for all entities to be allowed into the banking system with the exception of federally-regulated banks.  An exception for provincially-regulated financial institutions such as credit unions from accreditation is to be considered, as well.

The Report acknowledges that the accreditation criteria should be robust enough to protect consumers, but not too onerous that it excludes a wide range of market participants and notes that “holding adequate insurance or some comparable financial guarantee will be critical to ensure accountability among accredited third-party service providers”.

Technical specifications and standards

The Report recommends that technical standards be developed for sharing, accessing, safeguarding, and revoking data among system participants. Notably, the Report does not take a stance on whether a single standard, applicable to all participants ought to be developed. Rather, it states that efforts to develop technical specifications should continue, and these standards should be guided by certain principles. These principles include ensuring that the open banking system is capable of evolving with technological change and that it is compatible and interoperable with international approaches.

Conclusion

The Report contains many other recommendations and maps out a timeline for introducing open banking in Canada. It proposes that the first phase be implemented by January 2023. It remains to be seen whether or not these recommendations will be followed, especially given the upcoming federal election in 2021. Nevertheless, financial institutions and FinTech companies should be alert to the possibility that their obligations regarding consumers’ financial data could soon change.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Universal interest arbitration proposed for New Brunswick

April 5, 2016

On March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…

Read More

Good Faith Fisheries: New case on Crown consultation & regulation of Aboriginal fisheries

March 22, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…

Read More

Atlantic Employers’ Counsel – Winter 2016

March 10, 2016

THE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…

Read More

Hiring the “Right” Employee

February 24, 2016

By Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…

Read More

Bye, Bye Canadian P.I.?: What Apple’s fight against the FBI means for the protection of Personal Information in Canada

February 23, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2016 Proxy Season

February 12, 2016

In preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Left Sharks and Copy Cats: The Super Bowl’s Impact on Protecting a Brand

February 5, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…

Read More

The Labour Relations of First Nations’ Fisheries: Who gets to decide?

February 2, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…

Read More

Can an employer prohibit tattoos and piercings?

January 21, 2016

By Peter McLellan, QC In the 1970s the issue for employers was long hair and sideburns. In the 1980’s it was earrings for men. Today the employer’s concerns are with tattoos and facial piercings. What are…

Read More

Settling for it: Two new NS decisions on settlement agreements and releases

January 15, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Introduction It sounds simple: Two disputing parties, hoping to resolve their disagreement without drawn-out court proceedings, will mutually agree to a settlement on clear terms; release each other from all claims; and move…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top