Skip to content

Institutional responsibility to prepare for COVID-19 cases on campus

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 07


Kate Jurgens

Since returning to class in September amidst the uncertainty of the COVID-19 global pandemic, students and faculty alike in classrooms, on campus, in residence, and in the workplace have learned to adapt to what has become the “new norm.”

It is not enough for institutions to rely on provincial health directives and provincial contact tracing measures. If and when a student, staff, or faculty member tests positive for the virus, the university must be prepared to take action. Arguably, the only way to efficiently respond is to have a policy prepared and in place when this occurs. Provincial guidance invites institutional response. In light of this, institutions should take it upon themselves to implement policies addressing how to handle positive COVID-19 tests so that, if and when positive tests arise on campus, swift action is taken to isolate those affected. This will allow institutions to remain open for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic while also ensuring minimal spread.

As we know, a key requirement for reducing the likelihood of COVID-19 transmission is reducing the number of close contact encounters. Reductions can be achieved through social distancing, campus density reductions, and wearing non-medical masks when social distancing cannot be achieved. While this will lead to a reduction in case numbers, positive COVID-19 tests amongst student populations are inevitable. In light of this, how can educational institutions aim to ensure the safety of staff and students while also attempting to remain open for business?

Ensuring the safety of students and staff

While government guidance invites institutional response to suspected cases, many institutions have not implemented policies governing what will happen in the event that a member of their community tests positive. Provincial guidelines¹ encourage or require (depending on the province) close contacts of those who have tested positive to self-isolate before public health becomes involved in contact tracing. If a teacher or professor reports COVID-19 symptoms, there is an immediate and cogent risk to all students in their classes. Given provincial guidance, waiting for public health to contact those who may have been exposed if and when there is a diagnosis is problematic.

These idiosyncrasies have not been addressed by many institutions. Instead of creating policies to further the objectives of public health officials, institutions are deferring to public health in reliance of their services for contact tracing as appropriate.

Implementing such policies will lead to swift, institution-specific reactions that will help to curb the spread of COVID-19 and allow such institutions to remain open for the remainder of the pandemic whilst at the same time ensuring the safety of the campus population.

Students must play a leading role in protecting their health

Student codes of conduct are another important way to curb the spread of COVID-19. In recent months we have seen many institutions implement or adapt student codes of conduct dealing directly with COVID-19 from the student perspective. These codes act to monitor and control student behaviour and in doing so create a contractual relationship between students and the institution outlining what constitutes acceptable behaviour.

In an effort to reduce the number of COVID-19 cases on campus and to maintain a safe environment for students, these institutions, through student codes of conduct and other COVID-19 related policies, can make clear that students share in the responsibility of keeping their community (and beyond) safe.

Failure to abide by the various provincial COVID-19 community health and safety requirements may be a violation of the code of conduct. For example, if students choose to have a party which violates the limits on social gatherings or they choose not to wear a mask in violation of provincial guidelines, the code of conduct can be used in order to discipline the students, through suspension or otherwise.

Violations can be investigated and adjudicated, resulting in residence dismissal, suspension, or financial penalties. Further, incidents and behavioural breaches can be forwarded to the RCMP for possible charges under the provincial health protection legislation.

Commitment to community wellness

Several Canadian universities have implemented student codes of conduct specific to COVID-19 or have created addendums to their existing codes of conduct in recent months. One notable feature that these policies seem to have in common is their commitment to community wellness. In general, students on and off campus are asked to review campus procedures daily and to take all necessary steps to protect others by following the directives based on self-assessment. As we are all aware, daily check-ins are crucially important during this pandemic, as COVID-related public health requirements seem to change on an almost daily basis.

Community wellness checklists often contain some combination of the following points:

  1. Monitor your health daily
  2. Ensure you are symptom-free prior to accessing campus
  3. Practise proper hygiene
  4. Maintain proper social distancing
  5. Wear a non-medical mask (depending on the jurisdiction and institution)
  6. Limit interactions on and off campus

Conclusion

It is not enough for institutions to rely on provincial health directives and provincial contact tracing measures. If and when a student, staff, or faculty member tests positive for COVID-19, the institution must be prepared to take action. Arguably, the only way to efficiently respond is to have an institution-specific policy prepared and in place when this occurs.

Waiting for public health to contact those who may have been exposed if and when there is a diagnosis is problematic.

Institutions should take it upon themselves to implement policies addressing how to handle positive COVID-19 tests. This will ultimately allow such institutions to remain operational while the COVID-19 pandemic remains present in our lives, while also ensuring minimal spread.

Although burdensome, implementing policies that align with public health measures focusing on contact tracing, self-reporting, self-isolating and testing if and when a student shows symptoms of COVID-19 is something that all educational institutions should seriously consider as we move into the winter months.


¹ Nova Scotia

Prince Edward Island

New Brunswick

Newfoundland and Labrador

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Universal interest arbitration proposed for New Brunswick

April 5, 2016

On March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…

Read More

Good Faith Fisheries: New case on Crown consultation & regulation of Aboriginal fisheries

March 22, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…

Read More

Atlantic Employers’ Counsel – Winter 2016

March 10, 2016

THE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…

Read More

Hiring the “Right” Employee

February 24, 2016

By Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…

Read More

Bye, Bye Canadian P.I.?: What Apple’s fight against the FBI means for the protection of Personal Information in Canada

February 23, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2016 Proxy Season

February 12, 2016

In preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Left Sharks and Copy Cats: The Super Bowl’s Impact on Protecting a Brand

February 5, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…

Read More

The Labour Relations of First Nations’ Fisheries: Who gets to decide?

February 2, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…

Read More

Can an employer prohibit tattoos and piercings?

January 21, 2016

By Peter McLellan, QC In the 1970s the issue for employers was long hair and sideburns. In the 1980’s it was earrings for men. Today the employer’s concerns are with tattoos and facial piercings. What are…

Read More

Settling for it: Two new NS decisions on settlement agreements and releases

January 15, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Introduction It sounds simple: Two disputing parties, hoping to resolve their disagreement without drawn-out court proceedings, will mutually agree to a settlement on clear terms; release each other from all claims; and move…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top