Skip to content

Pay Transparency: Recent Changes to PEI’s Employment Standards Act

Murray Murphy and Kate Profit

Changes to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) regarding pay transparency received royal assent on November 17, 2021 and has recently come into force as of June 1, 2022.

 

Pay History

 

Under these amendments, employers are prevented from seeking pay history information from applicants, whether directly or indirectly. This does not prevent an applicant from voluntarily disclosing their pay history information without prompting from the employer. When such information is provided by an applicant, an employer is entitled to rely on such information when determining pay for the applicant.

 

Employers are still able to seek information about pay ranges or aggregate pay provided for comparable positions for which the applicant is applying.

 

Pay Range Information

 

Employer’s who publicly advertise a job to the general public must include information about the expected pay or pay range for the posted position. “Publicly advertised job positing” is defined as:

 

an external job posting for a specific job that an employer advertises to the general public in any manner, but for greater certainty does not include recruitment campaigns, general help wanted signs or positions that are only advertised to existing employees of the employer

 

Anti-Reprisal

 

The amendments provide safeguards to allow employees to seek information from the employer and share pay information in the workplace without fear of reprisal. Specifically, employers are prevented from intimidating, dismissing, or otherwise penalizing an employee (or threatening to do so) when an employee:

 

  • Makes inquiries about pay or requests information on the employer’s pay policies;
  • Discloses pay information to another employee;
  • Provides information regarding the employer’s compliance or non-compliance; or
  • Asks the employer to comply with pay history, pay transparency, or anti-reprisal provisions.

 

Application

 

These changes will apply to all non-unionized workplaces. However, some changes will not apply to those governed by a collective agreement.

 

Subsection 2(4) of the ESA sets out that only certain provisions of the ESA are applicable to employees whose terms and conditions are established by a collective agreement pursuant to the Labour Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. L-1.

 

Pay transparency provisions span sections 5.8 (pay history), 5.9 (pay range information), and 5.10 (anti-reprisal) of the ESA, however, it is only section 5.10 that will apply to unionized workplaces.

 

Key Takeaways

 

Pay transparency amendments will likely result in changes to employer’s hiring practices, including what questions they ask and what information is offered to the applicant. Namely, these changes will require many employers to share pay information (being either expected pay or a pay range) when jobs are posted publicly.

 


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top