Skip to content

The Atlantic Immigration Program – now a permanent pathway for immigration

Included in Beyond the border: Immigration update – February 2022


Sara Espinal Henao

The Atlantic Immigration Pilot Program has finally become a permanent immigration pathway. Designated employers in Atlantic Canada will be able to continue using the program to fill labour shortages with international talent while supporting permanent settlement in the region. The Government of Canada announced this decision on December 17, 2021, and the program became a permanent fixture of Canada’s immigration landscape effective January 1, 2022, changing its name to the Atlantic Immigration Program (“AIP”). The Government of Canada will welcome 6,000 newcomers to Atlantic Canada per year using this pathway.

The decision to transition this program into a permanent immigration option is hardly surprising in light of its proven track record. Launched in 2017 as part of the Atlantic Growth Strategy, the Pilot was widely successful at both attracting and retaining talent, bringing almost 10,000 newcomers to the region. By 2019, only two years after its launch, the Pilot had already reached 78 per cent of its immigration target, approving 91 per cent of all AIP applications received, and bringing 5,590 newcomers. As of May 2021, AIP employers had collectively made over 9,200 job offers in various sectors, from manufacturing to health care, welcoming over 8,000 foreign nationals and their families to the region.

While the Pilot version of this now permanent immigration pathway officially closed on December 31, 2021, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) continues to accept applications under the Pilot from those with a valid provincial endorsement until March 5, 2022. Candidates with valid endorsements under the permanent version will be able to submit applications under the new program starting March 6, 2022.

To meet varying labour market and skill level needs, this immigration pathway remains available for skilled workers and international graduates, depending on the individual’s job offer, work experience, and educational credentials. However, while remaining largely unchanged from its previous iteration, the AIP now includes a few noteworthy amendments to its process and eligibility criteria for both foreign nationals and the designated employers who seek to employ them.

Important changes for employers

A new designation process

Like its Pilot counterpart, the AIP operates with an employer-driven model. Employers will need to be designated under the new program by an Atlantic province to be able to use it to hire foreign talent. Previously designated employers under the Pilot version will also need to reapply for designation with their respective province. To date, new processes for designation under the program have already entered into effect in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador.

Onboarding training now required 

While each province has its own guidelines for designation, all employers will now be required to take mandatory onboarding training and intercultural competency training before their first endorsement application under the program can be approved.

Onboarding training is expected to cover information about the Canadian immigration system and the AIP, and is intended to provide employers with a comprehensive overview of their roles and responsibilities under the program. Similarly, international competency training will include education on how to overcome implicit bias in hiring and managing employees, as part of the employer’s commitment to establishing a welcoming workplace environment. Training service providers are now available at each province to facilitate this process.

A Dedicated Service Channel

To facilitate communication with the government, designated employers under the program will have access to enhanced employer support services through a Dedicated Service Channel. Through this Channel, they will be able to receive timely support from program officers on applications submitted under the program. Provinces will refer employers to the Channel after their first endorsement, and will be available to employers for up to a year after they have successfully endorsed their first candidate under the program.

Important changes for foreign nationals

A modernized application process

At the federal level, the permanent residence application process for the AIP will be modernized with an online application option. This much welcomed digital submission option will eliminate the need to mail out applications for permanent residence on paper, potentially improving processing times and allowing the applicant to obtain immediate confirmation of receipt of their application once it is submitted.

Modified language and education requirements

One of the appeals of the Atlantic Immigration Pilot Program was its lower language and education requirements compared to most other immigration pathways at federal and provincial levels. Secondary level education was sufficient for the purpose of applying under the Pilot’s high-skilled and intermediate-skilled streams. Similarly, the Pilot only required that the applicant show a minimum level of Canadian Language Benchmark 4 to meet language proficiency requirements.

While still comparatively more lenient vis-à-vis other programs, the language and education requirements for certain occupations has been strengthened under the new program. Candidates with National Occupational Classifications (“NOC”) 0, A or B job offers will now need to show minimum language level of Canadian Language Benchmark 5. Similarly, candidates with NOC 0 or A job offers will now need to show a minimum one-year Canadian post-secondary program credential, or equivalency, demonstrated by an Educational Credential Assessment.

Expanded eligibility period for work experience

Despite somewhat increasing education and language requirements for some prospective applicants, the new program proves to be more lenient than its Pilot version regarding what will count as eligible work experience. The previous version counted only work experience obtained over the three years preceding the date of submission of an application. The new program expands the period of eligible work experience to five years. This shift is expected to expand the talent pool that employers would be able to recruit from.

Flexible work experience

In addition to extending the period of eligibility for qualifying work experience, the new program shows a more flexible approach to employment in the health care sector, carving out an exemption to the general rule that job offers must be at the same skill level, or higher, as the qualifying work experience. Down-skilling will be allowed for sector-specific job offers that fall under NOC 3413 (nurse aides, orderlies and patient service associates) and NOC 4412 (home health care workers). Eligible candidates will be able to use related work experience gained in higher skilled positions, as practical or registered nurses. This flexibility would allow candidates with work experience in high-skilled health care occupations to access the program with a job offer in the health care sector at the intermediate-skill level, and aims to help the Atlantic region respond to labour market needs in this chronically in-demand sector.

Undoubtedly, the re-launch of AIP as a permanent pathway for immigration is a welcomed development by Canadian employers and newcomers alike, signaling a promising and enduring future for immigration to the region. If you are interested in exploring the AIP as an avenue for immigration or to fill your local labour demands, please contact a member of our immigration team and we would be happy to assist.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Immigration group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Good Faith Fisheries: New case on Crown consultation & regulation of Aboriginal fisheries

March 22, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…

Read More

Atlantic Employers’ Counsel – Winter 2016

March 10, 2016

THE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…

Read More

Hiring the “Right” Employee

February 24, 2016

By Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…

Read More

Bye, Bye Canadian P.I.?: What Apple’s fight against the FBI means for the protection of Personal Information in Canada

February 23, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2016 Proxy Season

February 12, 2016

In preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Left Sharks and Copy Cats: The Super Bowl’s Impact on Protecting a Brand

February 5, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…

Read More

The Labour Relations of First Nations’ Fisheries: Who gets to decide?

February 2, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…

Read More

Can an employer prohibit tattoos and piercings?

January 21, 2016

By Peter McLellan, QC In the 1970s the issue for employers was long hair and sideburns. In the 1980’s it was earrings for men. Today the employer’s concerns are with tattoos and facial piercings. What are…

Read More

Settling for it: Two new NS decisions on settlement agreements and releases

January 15, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Introduction It sounds simple: Two disputing parties, hoping to resolve their disagreement without drawn-out court proceedings, will mutually agree to a settlement on clear terms; release each other from all claims; and move…

Read More

Labour and Employment Legislative Update 2015

December 23, 2015

2015 ends with changes in workplace laws that our region’s employers will want to be aware of moving into 2016. Some legislation has been proclaimed and is in force, some has passed and will be…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top