Skip to content

Client Update: Proposed reform of Ontario’s labour and employment statutes

Mark Tector and Annie Gray

This morning, May 30, 2017, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne announced her government’s intention to introduce sweeping legislative reform of labour and employment laws.

If passed, the proposed Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017 would usher in a range of amendments to Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) and Labour Relations Act (“LRA”).

Underlying recommendations

The proposed changes come in response to the final report of the Changing Workplaces Review, which was released on May 23, 2017 and contains a total of 173 recommendations.

First commissioned in 2015, the Review was touted as Canada’s first-ever independent review of employment standards and labour relations statutes in a single process.

The Review responds to concerns it identified in the current labour market, including precarious work, income disparity between part-time and full-time workers and the disproportionate impact of those realities on women, youths, seniors and ethnic minorities.

Proposed changes

If passed, highlights from the proposed legislation include the following:

Employment Standards

Minimum wage increase

  • To $14/hour as of January 1, 2018 and $15/hour as of January 1, 2019, with annual increases thereafter at the rate of inflation (currently, the minimum wage in Ontario is $11.40/hr).

Equal pay for equal work

  • Casual, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees would be paid the same wage as full-time employees when performing the same job for the same employer.
  • Temporary Help Agency employees would be guaranteed pay equal to the client’s permanent employees for the same job.
  • All employees would be protected from reprisal for making wage inquiries.
  • Exceptions to the general rule would exist for wage differences based on systems of seniority, merit or measures of production.
  • If passed, these proposals would come into effect as of April 1, 2018.

Termination of temporary assignment

  • Temporary Help Agencies would be required to provide at least one week’s notice when an assignment originally scheduled to last longer than 3 months will be terminated early.
  • If less than one week’s notice is provided, the employee will have to be paid the difference unless s/he is offered reasonable work of at least one week’s duration during the notice period.
  • This proposal would come into force, if passed, as of January 1, 2018.

Scheduling

  • Employees with more than 3 months of employment would be entitled to request scheduling or location changes with protection against reprisal.
    • If less than 4 days’ notice is given, employees can refuse to accept shifts.employees would need to be paid 3 hours at their regular wage:
    • when given less than 3 hours upon reporting to work (if the employee regularly works in excess of 3 hours per day).
    • when a shift is cancelled less than 48 hours in advance.
    • for every 24 period in which they are on-call but not called in to
      work.
  • This proposal would come into effect on January 1, 2019.

Employee misclassification

  • Employers who inaccurately classify employees as independent contractors would be subject to specific penalties including prosecution, public disclosure of convictions and fines.
  • Where proper classification is in dispute the employer would bear the burden of proof.
  • There will be no change to the ESA definition of “employee” to specifically include “dependant contractors.”

Related employer provision

  • Ontario’s related employer provision would no longer require that the “intent or effect” of the business arrangement be to defeat the purpose of the ESA.

Vacation and holiday pay

  • Employees with more than 5 years of employment with the same employer would be entitled to 3 weeks of paid vacation (currently, it is 2 weeks with no increase over time).
  • The formula for calculating holiday pay would be simplified.
  • Both these changes would take effect as of January 1, 2018.

Paid leaves

  • There would no longer be a 50 employee threshold for entitlement to personal emergency leave.
  • Employees would be entitled to 10 personal emergency days per year, 2 of them paid.
  • There would be a new, separate leave for child death or crime-related disappearance, with a maximum duration of 104 weeks.
  • Family medical leave would increase from 8 weeks in a 26-week period to 27 weeks in a 52-week period.

Enforcement

  • Enforcement would be enhanced, including with an increase in administrative penalties and publication of information regarding contraventions and accompanying penalties.
  • 175 more Officers would be hired by 2020-21 with the goal of having all claims resolved within 90 days.
  • The province will launch an educational program regarding rights and obligations and provide compliance assistance to employers.

Labour Relations

Certification

  • Card-based certification would apply to temporary help agencies, building services and home care and community services industries.
  • It would be easier for a union to be certified where employers contravene the LRA.
  • There would be easier access to first contract arbitration, as well as a new mediation component.
  • First contract mediation-arbitration applications would be prioritized over displacement and decertification applications.
  • Unions with the support of at least 20% of employees would be provided with employee lists and contact information .
  • The Board would be allowed to conduct votes outside the workplace, including with the use of technology.
  • Officers would be empowered to provide directions regarding the voting process.

Other protections and procedures

  • Successor rights would extend to retendering of building services contracts.
  • Employers would be required to reinstate employees at the conclusion of a strike or lock out.
  • Employers could not discipline or discharge employees without just cause between the time of certification and conclusion of a first contract, or the period between the date when employees are in a strike/lock-out position and the completion of a new agreement.
  • Maximum fines would increase to $5,000 for individuals and $100,000 for organizations.

Statutory exemptions and special industry rules relevant to both employment standards and labour relations will be considered through consultations with stakeholders.

What this means for you

Our clients who conduct business in Ontario need to be aware of these extensive proposed changes for their own workplaces.

More broadly, however, the changes currently proposed in Ontario respond to a labour and employment landscape that is largely shared across Canada and may inform legislative changes in other provinces, including the Maritimes. Alberta has already followed in Ontario’s footsteps by announcing a similar labour and employment overhaul and it is plausible that significant revisions could follow in jurisdictions across Canada.

The foregoing is intended for general information only. If you have any questions about how this may affect your business, please contact a member of our Labour & Employment practice group.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top