Client Update: To B or Not To B? Potential Changes to PEI Auto Insurance
Significant changes may be coming to the standard automobile policy in PEI, including increases to the accident benefits available under Section B and an increase to the so-called “cap” applicable to claims for minor personal injury.
The PEI superintendant of insurance is preparing a formal proposal to government recommending significant changes to Section B of the standard automobile insurance policy in PEI, to provide more benefits for those injured in motor vehicle accidents.
The proposal is at the preliminary stages, thus it is not yet clear which changes will be put forward. Some of the changes being considered by the superintendant are as follows:
1. Increase in No-Fault Accident Benefits
No-fault accident benefits available under the PEI standard auto policy (i.e. Section B benefits) are expected to increase, mirroring the accident benefits available in New Brunswick. If approved, this would mean significant increases to the current limits available in PEI:
| Accident Benefits | Current PEI Benefits | Current NB Benefits | Potential new PEI Benefits |
| Meical and Rehabilitation Expenses | $25,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
| Funeral Expenses | $1,000 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
| Death Benefits – Head of Household | $10,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
| Death Benefits – Spouse of Head of Household | $10,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Death Benefits – Dependent | $2,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| Weekly Income | Lesser of $140/week or 80 per cent of the insured’s gross weekly income from employment – maximum of 104 weeks | Lesser of $250/week or 80 per cent of the insured’s gross weekly income from employment – maximum of 104 weeks | Lesser of $250/week or 80 per cent of the insured’s gross weekly income from employment – maximum of 104 weeks |
2. Changes to the Cap for Minor Personal Injury
The superintendent is expected to recommend that the so-called cap on non-pecuniary damages for minor personal injury increase from $2,500 to $7,500 or $8,000, bringing it in line with Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. He might also recommend that the PEI cap be indexed with the consumer price index.
Although details are still currently unavailable, changes may also be proposed to the definition of “minor personal injury”, possibly adopting the language in New Brunswick or Nova Scotia.
3. Direct Compensation for Property Damage
The superintendant is expected to propose a shift to direct compensation for property damage.
4. Introduction of Catastrophic Accident Benefits
The superintendent is also considering the adoption of catastrophic accident benefits within the automobile insurance policy, but they are not expected to form part of the superintendant’s upcoming proposal to government. These benefits would expand the coverage provided by Section B to include excess medical and rehabilitation coverage for individuals who are “catastrophically” injured in a motor vehicle accident, but are unable to recover from a third party.
What this means for you
Some or all of these amendments could be included in legislation to be passed this fall (2013). The superintendant has made it clear that there will be an opportunity for insurers to provide input after his proposal is made to government.
Archive
Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…
Read MoreOn July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…
Read MoreOn April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…
Read MoreIn May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…
Read MoreOn May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…
Read MoreBy Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…
Read MoreIn a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…
Read More