Skip to content

Employer immigration compliance obligations

Kathleen Leighton

Employers in Canada are obligated to only employ individuals who are legally able to work for them. Individuals who are neither citizens nor permanent residents of Canada, but who wish to work in Canada (“foreign workers”), generally must obtain a work permit.

While some work permits are “open”, meaning they will allow the permit holder to work for nearly any employer and in nearly any role, other work permits are more restrictive. Namely, “employer-specific” work permits limit the permit holder to working for the employer named on the permit, as well as in the position and location specified on the permit. These permits are therefore also less flexible in terms of the permit holder’s ability to move roles or employers.

In order for a foreign national to obtain an employer-specific work permit, it is necessary for employers to take certain active steps to assist, as discussed below.

Relevant programs

There are two main programs through which an individual can obtain an employer-specific work permit:

  1. The Temporary Foreign Worker Program (“TFWP”): The TFWP enables employers to hire foreign nationals to address labour and skill shortages in their business if they are unable to locate suitably skilled and available Canadian citizens or permanent residents.The employer must apply to Employment and Social Development Canada (“ESDC”) / Service Canada for a Labour Market Impact Assessment (“LMIA”). If a positive LMIA is granted to the employer, the foreign national that the employer wishes to hire can use the LMIA to apply for a work permit.

 

  1. The International Mobility Program (“IMP”): The IMP provides opportunities for employers to hire foreign nationals without an LMIA, as certain workers are considered exempt from the LMIA process. There are a number of categories of LMIA-exempt work permits under the IMP, and the majority of them lead to an employer-specific work permit.While an LMIA is not required, the employer must instead prepare and submit an Online Offer of Employment (aka an Employer Compliance Submission) through the Government of Canada’s Employer Portal, and must pay a $230 Compliance Fee, in order to support the foreign national’s application for the employer-specific work permit.

Creation of obligations

By using the TFWP and IMP, employers are agreeing to various conditions, including to remain actively engaged in the business in respect of which the offer of employment was made, make reasonable efforts to provide a work place free of abuse, and comply with relevant employment and recruitment laws, among others.

Additionally, when preparing an LMIA under the TFWP or Employer Compliance Submission under the IMP, the employer is required to outline various conditions of the foreign national’s employment, including details like the individual’s job title, job duties, hours of work, salary or hourly wage, benefits entitlement, location of work, and similar. In providing these details to facilitate a foreign national’s work permit application, the employer is creating obligations to ESDC or Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) respectively to honour those conditions.

Employer compliance

Both ESDC and IRCC have the authority to review the activities of any employer using their programs, including by conducting audits or inspections, in order to ensure the employer is complying with their obligations.

For example, these entities may wish to confirm if an employer is in fact providing the foreign national with the salary indicated in an LMIA or providing the type of work outlined in an Online Offer of Employment. Findings of non-compliance with the conditions of work as provided can lead to various consequences, including warnings, monetary penalties, a ban from using the TFWP or IMP, and more.

Our Immigration Team is able to advise employers of foreign workers regarding their obligations and provide best practices to avoid non-compliance and the consequences that may follow.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Immigration group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top