Skip to content

Federal pay equity comes into force August 31, 2021

Annie Gray and Dante Manna

The federal government has announced that the Pay Equity Act (“Act”) will come into force on August 31, 2021. It has also published the final version of the Pay Equity Regulations (“Regulations”), to come into effect on the same date.

For its part, the Canadian Human Rights Commission has also updated its website with a number of interpretations, policies and guidelines in order to facilitate the successful creation of pay equity plans under the Act and Regulations.

Refresher on pay equity

Pay equity is focused on achieving equal pay for work of equal value, recognizing that female jobs have historically been undervalued when compared to traditionally male positions of comparable value.

The Act and Regulations mandate a proactive approach to the achievement of pay equity by federally regulated employers with 10 or more employees. Once the Act comes into force, such employers will have three years to establish and implement a pro-active pay equity plan. This marks a monumental shift from the current, complaint-based pay equity regime under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Timeline for employers

The government’s announcement confirms the general timeline for qualifying federally regulated employers as follows:

  • November 1, 2021 – Employers must post a notice, informing their employees of their obligations under the Act. This notice must remain posted until the plan is completed or employer obligations change. The government has published template notices here.
  • Employers with an average of more than 100 employees, or any unionized employees, will be required to establish a pay equity committee. A pay equity committee is a joint committee comprised of employer, employee and/or union representatives, as required by the Act.
  • The employer (or pay equity committee, if there is one) must develop the pay equity plan, by:
    • Identifying job classes in the workplace;
    • Determining which job classes are commonly held by women and which ones are commonly held by men;
    • Valuing the work done in each of these job classes;
    • Calculating total compensation for each predominantly male and female job class; and,
    • Determining whether there are differences in compensation between jobs of equal value. If so, the pay equity plan must provide pay increases calculated using the mathematical formulas given in the Regulations.
  • The employer must post a draft of the pay equity plan along with a notice to employees of their right to provide comments. Employees must have 60 days to comment on the plan.
  • September 3, 2024 – Final date for employers to share their final pay equity plan and notice of related pay increases with employees. If less than 1% of the total payroll, pay increases are to be made the day after the final plan is posted.
  • The pay equity plan may phase in pay increases over 3-5 years (depending on number of employees) if the total amount of increases is greater than 1% of total payroll.
  • Collect “snapshot” data annually and review any changes made in the prior year that may impact pay equity.
  • Update the plan at least once every five years.

The final Regulations

In a previous post, we outlined key takeaways from the draft regulations, which were published in November of 2020. Following a round of consultations, the final Regulations remain broadly similar, but include several changes from their draft form, including:

  • specifying when and how long documents must be posted in the workplace;
  • eliminating certain time limits for filing applications and notices;
  • requiring plans and annual statements to note when predetermined values of work have been used;
  • changes to the process for updating a pay equity plan; and
  • changes to provisions addressing the application of the Act to employee bargaining units whose wages are frozen.

The Regulations can be found here.

Time to act

Now that the date of effect has been announced, it is crucial that federally regulated employers begin laying the groundwork for the creation of their pay equity plans. We would be pleased to assist in providing guidance and advice regarding the pay equity process.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top