Skip to content

Government of Canada announces changes to Employment Insurance and Work-Share Program as part of $1 billion COVID-19 fund

Jennifer Thompson

As employees and employers grapple with the practical implications of a potential COVID-19 outbreak, the Government of Canada has stepped up to the plate with an announcement of a $1 billion fund to finance a range of measures aimed at limiting the spread of the virus and preparing the country for what seems like an inevitable wider outbreak across Canada.

One of the announced measures, which will ease concerns of many employees, is waiving the mandatory one week waiting period for Employment Insurance (“EI”).  The impact of this is that employees who are unable to work due to COVID-19 will now be able to claim EI from the first day of sickness, rather than having to wait a week before they can receive any payments.  This measure will also benefit those who are in quarantine or who have been directed to self-isolate as a precaution.  This may not apply to those who voluntarily self-isolate without direction from public health officials, but may cover those asked to quarantine by their employer where this measure was recommended by public health officials.  At this stage, it is also unclear what documentation would be required.  Unfortunately, this announcement does not address those not eligible for EI sickness benefits; however, the government has confirmed that it will be considering what help may be available to those individuals, including income support.

The announcement also included enhancements to the Work-Sharing program.  This is a program “designed to help employers and employees avoid layoffs when there is a temporary reduction in the normal level of business activity that is beyond the control of the employer. The measure provides income support to employees eligible for Employment Insurance benefits who work a temporarily reduced work week while their employer recovers.”¹ Ordinarily, this program can be used for a maximum of 38 weeks, however, this has now been extended to 76 weeks to help employers and employees during any economic downturn as a result of COVID-19.  It should be noted that both the employer and employee must agree to the Work-Sharing arrangement.

The other measures included in the $1 billion package include:

  • $50m to the Public Health Agency of Canada for public education and communications;
  • $550m to the provinces and territories for “critical health care system needs” in support of its statement that financial considerations will not and should not be an obstacle to the necessary preparations;
  • $100m for federal health measures, including supporting the preparations of the First Nations and Inuit communities;
  • $275m towards research into COVID-19, including vaccines and potential treatments;
  • $50m to the Public Health Agency of Canada for purchases of personal protective equipment for the provinces and territories; and
  • $50m to the World Health Organization to support global efforts.

The full statement from the Government of Canada can be found here.


¹ Employment and Social Development Canada, https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/services/work-sharing.html


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top