Skip to content

New Brunswick regulator seeks input on revised proposed rule under Unclaimed Property Act

Christopher Marr, TEP and Level Chan with the assistance of Annelise Harnanan (summer student)

On May 20, 2021, the New Brunswick Financial and Consumer Services Commission (“FCNB”) released a revised version of one of its proposed rules (“Revised Rule”) under the Unclaimed Property Act (“the Act”). As detailed in our previous client update, the Act aims to reconnect New Brunswickers with their forgotten or lost assets, and to release holders of lost assets from any liability with respect to those assets, by allowing lost assets to be transferred to the Director of Unclaimed Property. The Act received Royal Assent in March 2020 and will come into force once the associated rules are finalized.¹

FCNB first published draft rules for comment in September 2020, and received 14 comments from businesses and other organizations. The Revised Rule was prepared by FCNB in response to those comments, and includes the following significant changes:

Changes to the categories of property that are excluded from application of the Act

  • Property held in a safe deposit box by a provincially regulated credit union, trust company, caisse populaire or federal financial institution, was clarified to include all property held in safekeeping by any of the foregoing institutions (s. 3(1)(c)).
  • Property that is an insurance policy and is deemed non-payable due to an exclusion permitted by the Insurance Act, and property that is held by a federal institution as defined in the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (Canada) were added as new categories of excluded property (s. 3(f) and (g)).

Distinguishing between registered accounts and non-registered accounts

  • The time periods for property to be considered unclaimed set out in Section 5 of the Revised Rule now treat property held in a registered plan and property held outside of registered plans as distinct categories (s. 5(1)-(2)). A period of three years remains the general rule, however the Revised Rule clarifies when that period starts.

Increasing the fair market value of property that is not required to be reported or delivered

  • The Revised Rule increases the baseline amount for when holders of unclaimed property do not need to submit an unclaimed property report or deliver the associated unclaimed property to the Director of the new program to $1,000. Now, under s. 6(1), a holder may not have to submit a report or deliver the unclaimed property if:
  1. the total fair market value of the property from the previous five years is less than $1,000; and
  2. each individual property has a fair market value of less than $50.

Amendments adding registered disability savings plans and tax-free savings accounts

  • Other registered accounts, such as tax free savings accounts and registered disability savings plans, were added to the Revised Rule (s. 5(2)).

With respect to registered pension plans, the Revised Rule continues to provide that the Act only applies to a wound-up pension plan but not an ongoing pension plan. FCNB said they may consider measures for ongoing pension plans at a later date. The Revised Rule also continues to exclude benefits from an ongoing accident, disability or sickness insurance policy.

FCNB has invited stakeholders to submit their comments on the Revised Rule during a 30-day period, ending on June 19, 2021. Written submissions may be sent to:

Secretary
Financial and Consumer Services Commission
85 Charlotte Street, Suite 300
Saint John, N.B.   E2L 2J2
Telephone:    506‐658‐3060
Toll Free:   866‐933‐2222
Fax:     506‐658‐3059
E‐mail:    information@fcnb.ca


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


¹ See this note published by the FCNB regarding unclaimed property.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top