Pensions & Employee Benefits Update: Nova Scotia pension funding framework & regulatory review
Peter McLellan, QC & Level Chan
In September 2017, Nova Scotia’s Department of Finance and Treasury Board announced that stakeholder input is being sought regarding potential permanent changes to the funding framework for defined benefit pension plans for Nova Scotia.
There is no indication as to any preferred course of action for Nova Scotia; however the discussion paper does summarize what has been done in the past in Nova Scotia – predominantly temporary solvency relief (and permanent solvency relief for certain quasi-public sector plans) – and also references what has been done in other jurisdictions, notable Ontario and Quebec. This is an important opportunity for sponsors of defined benefit pension plans in Nova Scotia to have input on the regime on a go forward basis in Nova Scotia:
- Do we maintain the status quo (full solvency funding)?
- Do we eliminate solvency funding and enhance going concern funding (e.g. the Ontario approach)?
- Do we reduce solvency funding – i.e. from 100% to 85%?
Input is also being sought on a number of regulatory issues including:
- Should Nova Scotia proceed with providing for target benefit plans? If so, should they be restricted to unionized workplaces and should defined benefit plans be permitted to convert to target benefit plans, including accrued benefits?
- What restrictions should apply to annuity buy-outs?
- Should Nova Scotia mirror or adopt recently updated federal investment regulations?
The Province has set a deadline of Friday, November 10, 2017 for stakeholder input.
Our Pensions and Employee Benefits Group would be pleased to discuss this review with you and to assist in any submissions to be made to the Province.
Archive
Recent changes to the Rules of the Supreme Court, 1986, SNL 1986, c 42, Sch D On December 14, 2012, several changes were made to the Rules of the Supreme Court. These changes include: who may act…
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE: Putting Trust in your Estate Planning, by Paul Coxworthy and Michael McGonnell The Risks, for Insurers in Entering Administration Services Only (ASO) Contracts, by Tyana Caplan Angels in Atlantic Canada, by Allison McCarthy, Gavin Stuttard and Adam Bata…
Read MoreBill 31, An Act Respecting Human Rights, came into force on June 24, 2010 replacing the Human Rights Code (the “Code”). For more information, please download a copy of this client update.
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE Expanded Fines and Penalties for Environmental Offences: The New Federal Environmental Enforcement Act Spam about to be Canned? Preparing a Business for Sale Business Disputes Corner – Place of Arbitration and Selected…
Read MoreThe Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has unanimously upheld the province’s legislative limits on general damage recovery for “minor injuries”. Today’s decision, authored by Chief Justice Michael MacDonald, completely affirms the January 2009 decision of…
Read MoreThe Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) announced helpful administrative positions concerning the new rules under the Fifth Protocol to the Canada-US Income Tax Convention, 1980 which will come into effect on January 1, 2010. The CRA…
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE Contractor Held Liable for Business Interruption: Heyes v. City of Vancouver, 2009 BCSC 651 When Can a Tendering Authority Walk Away if Bids are Too High? Crown Paving Ltd. v. Newfoundland &…
Read MoreWithholding tax and other issues under the Fifth Protocol The Fifth Protocol to the Canada-US Tax Convention, 1980 introduced significant changes which may affect the use of most unlimited companies and other so-called ULCs. These…
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE An Eye for an Eye: Alberta Court of Appeal Upholds Finding of Retaliation Liability as a Result of Generosity in Quebec Undue Hardship Established in Scent Case Parents of Twins Get Double…
Read More- « Previous
- 1
- …
- 59
- 60
- 61