Privacy practice tune-up – getting ready for the Consumer Privacy Protection Act
As we wrote about earlier, Canada’s federal government has proposed a replacement to our national privacy law for commercial transactions known as the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”).
The new bill is the Digital Charter Implementation Act, and this bill in turn would create a new Consumer Privacy Protection Act (“CPPA”) which would replace the privacy portion of PIPEDA.
The CPPA will likely not come into force for a year or more, while consultations and the drafting of regulations proceed.
However, the proposed CPPA does restate and expand on the existing privacy law requirements of PIPEDA, and if your business needs a privacy tune-up then CPPA can provide a useful guide, with better detail than PIPEDA offers now.
Privacy management program
For example, CPPA requires all organizations (including businesses) to implement a “privacy management program” including policies, practices and procedures for protection of personal information, complaints handling, training of personnel and for explaining these practices to the public. This program must take into account the “volume and sensitivity of the personal information” under the organization’s control.
CPPA also obliges an organization to provide the federal Privacy Commissioner with access to all policies, practices and procedures of its privacy management program, merely upon request, which of course could give the Commissioner a good look into any program gaps. If the Commissioner has reasonable grounds to believe that a breach of privacy obligations has occurred, then the Commissioner may choose to “audit” these practices.
Further detail on consent
The required consent for use of personal information is also described in CPPA in greater detail, and states that consent is only valid if at or before the time that the organization seeks the individual’s consent, it provides the following information in “plain language”:
(a) the purposes for the collection, use or disclosure;
(b) the way in which the personal information is to be collected, used or disclosed;
(c) any reasonably foreseeable consequences of the collection, use or disclosure of the personal information;
(d) the specific type of personal information that is to be collected, used or disclosed; and
(e) the names of any third parties or types of third parties to which the organization may disclose the personal information.
Consent must be obtained at or before collection, and must be express unless it is appropriate to rely on implied consent, taking into account the reasonable expectations of the individual and the sensitivity of the personal information.
Plain language privacy policies
CPPA also gives clearer guidance on privacy policies to be made available to customers and others providing personal information, which must again be in “plain language” and include at least the following:
(a) a description of the type of personal information under the organization’s control;
(b) a general account of how the organization makes use of personal information, including how the organization applies any permitted exceptions;
(c) a general account of the organization’s use of any automated decision system (e.g. AI systems) to make predictions, recommendations or decisions about individuals that could have significant impacts on them;
(d) whether or not the organization carries out any international or interprovincial transfer or disclosure of personal information that may have reasonably foreseeable privacy implications;
(e) how an individual may make a request for disposal or access; and
(f) the business contact information for your privacy officer.
While the policy requirements above about automated decision systems and international and interprovincial transfers are part of many policies now, they are new as express requirements of the law.
Therefore, all businesses that may be considering a tune-up of their privacy practices and policies should review the standards as outlined in the proposed CPPA, including those above.
This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Privacy group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership articles and updates.
Archive
In a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…
Read MoreOn Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…
Read MoreOn March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…
Read MoreTHE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…
Read MoreBy Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…
Read MoreBy Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…
Read MoreIn preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…
Read MoreBy Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…
Read More