Skip to content

Travelling to visit a cottage or summer home in Canada during COVID-19

 

Kathleen Leighton

Those who have vacation homes or cottages in Canada may be starting to form their summer plans as temperatures begin to rise. However, the ongoing pandemic has resulted in a host of restrictions limiting travel to Canada, and these rules have been changing rapidly. Many are understandably unclear on whether they are able to come to Canada for this purpose, and the answer will vary from person to person. Most of the rules currently in place apply to foreign nationals, as discussed below, but there are also considerations for Canadian citizens and permanent residents.

Health check and quarantine requirements for all travellers

Health check

Everyone flying to Canada, even Canadian citizens and permanent residents, will be subject to a health check. If a traveller has COVID-19 related symptoms, they will likely not be permitted to board their flight. Travellers should also be equipped with a non-medical mask or face covering.

Quarantine requirements

There are quarantine requirements at the federal level and, in some cases, the provincial level. The federal rules apply to every person entering Canada, whether they are a foreign national, Canadian citizen, or permanent resident. Assuming a traveller is asymptomatic on arrival, they will likely be required to quarantine for a 14-day period and will need to have access to food, medicine, and any other necessities of life while in quarantine. They will be asked questions on how they plan to access such things while quarantined at a cottage or summer home – they can’t simply stop at a grocery store on the way, for example.

Travellers will have to satisfy the border officer that they have an appropriate quarantine plan in place. This includes demonstrating that they will be able to quarantine in a location where they will not be in contact with vulnerable persons (unless the person is a consenting adult or parent or minor in a parent-minor relationship). Vulnerable persons include those with underlying medical conditions that make them more susceptible to COVID-19 complications, those with compromised immune systems from a medical condition or treatment, and those 65 or older.

While there are narrow exemptions to the quarantine requirements, they are unlikely to apply to someone who is coming to visit a cottage or summer home.

Canadian citizens and permanent residents (travel rules)

For those who are Canadian citizens (including dual-citizens) or permanent residents of Canada, there is no prohibition to enter Canada. However, appropriate travel documents and evidence of Canadian citizenship or permanent residency status will be required. Advice should be sought on this point as needed.

Foreign nationals (travel rules)

Foreign nationals, in this case persons who are not Canadian citizens or permanent residents, have additional rules and restrictions to consider. There is presently an Order in Council that applies to foreign nationals travelling to Canada from the United States (the “US OIC”), and a second Order in Council that applies to foreign nationals travelling to Canada from outside the United States (the “non-US OIC”).

US OIC rules (travelling to Canada from the US)

Under the US OIC, which is currently in place until June 21, 2020, foreign nationals are prohibited from travelling to Canada from the United States unless certain requirements are met. Namely, this particular OIC prohibits foreign nationals from entering Canada from the US if:

  1. They have COVID-19 or have signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (i.e. a fever or cough or fever and breathing difficulties) or even reasonable grounds to suspect they have such signs and symptoms;
  2. They will be unable to comply with quarantine requirements based on their purpose of entry and the length of their stay; or
  3. They are seeking entry for an optional or discretionary purpose (i.e. a non-essential purpose).

Assuming the travellers are asymptomatic and can comply with quarantine requirements, the main issue to be assessed is the third point (the purpose of entry).

“Optional or discretionary” purpose

As noted, foreign nationals cannot enter Canada from the US if their purpose for entry is optional or discretionary, which is defined in the relevant order as entry for “tourism, recreation, or entertainment” purposes.

Entry to visit a summer home or cottage is likely to be considered an “optional” visit that falls under the umbrella of tourism, recreation, or entertainment. Prior guidance from the Government of Canada also noted that entering “to spend time at a secondary residence (vacation home, hunting or fishing lodge, etc.)” is optional/discretionary, even when coming in for property upkeep or maintenance purposes. While that particular reference is no longer in the guidance, it is still a risk that entry for such purposes will be found optional.

A potential caveat may exist for an individual who is the immediate family member of a Canadian citizen or permanent resident. Specifically, a foreign national does not need to show their purpose for entry is essential (aka not optional or discretionary) if they intend to enter Canada to be with their immediate Canadian citizen or permanent resident family member and can demonstrate an intent to stay in Canada for a period of at least 15 days. Therefore, if a visit to a cottage or vacation home also means being with an immediate family member in such circumstances, this should be allowed.

Note, “immediate family member” is a defined term. There would be recommended documentation to help show this definition is met and that there is an intent to stay for at least 15 days. Advice should be sought on these details.

Non-US OIC rules (travelling to Canada from outside the US)

The non-US OIC, which is in place until June 30, 2020, prevents foreign nationals from travelling to Canada if they are arriving from a foreign country other than the United States. This OIC then carves out a number of narrow exemptions to the general prohibition, most of which will not apply to someone seeking entry to visit a summer home. Individual advice should be sought on this point. However, there is a travel exemption for immediate family members of Canadian citizens or permanent residents, if they are not symptomatic.

If a foreign national is an immediate family member of a Canadian citizen or permanent resident and is asymptomatic, they will also need to show their purpose of entry is not optional or discretionary if they are coming for less than 15 days. As discussed above, a visit to a summer home or cottage will not likely be accepted. However, if they are asymptomatic and travelling with or entering to be with an immediate Canadian citizen or permanent resident family member at the summer home or cottage and can demonstrate an intention to enter Canada for at least 15 days, this should be accepted.

Again, advice should be sought to confirm if the definition of “immediate family member” is met and what documentation should be available for travel.

Provincial Requirements

The above travel restrictions exist at the federal level. All persons seeking to enter Canada should also consider if there are provincial restrictions in place for their destination province that will prevent them from entering to visit their summer home or cottage. This is important as some provinces do have entry restriction.

Conclusion

Canadian citizens and permanent residents, as well as foreign nationals who are immediate family members of Canadian citizens or permanent residents may be able to enter Canada to visit a cottage or summer home in some circumstances. Other individuals will likely be unsuccessful on the basis that their travel will be considered optional or discretionary. Those flying will be subject to a health check, and all travellers should have a detailed quarantine plan in place. In all cases, individual advice should be sought, and it must be understood that there is a wide range of discretion at the border that can result in different than anticipated outcomes, particularly during these unprecedented times.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, or any questions pertaining to your ability to travel to Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic, please contact a member of our Immigration Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership articles and updates.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top