Skip to content

Update on the Economic Mobility Program for Refugees (phase 2): The Economic Mobility Pathways Project (“EMPP”)

Included in Beyond the Border – July 2022


By Brittany Trafford; Fredericton

 

Brief Overview

In an attempt to address the Canadian labour market shortages, the Economic Mobility Pathways Pilot (“EMPP”), was introduced in 2018. The EMPP started out as a small research project to see whether there were refugees with the skills and qualifications to access existing economic immigration pathways. Now, with some administrative measures to offset the circumstances of their displacement, the EMPP is working to provide long lasting solutions for skilled refugees who are needed by Canadian employers.  The EMPP was implemented in two phases with the goal of immigrating skilled refugees to Canada through existing economic programs. A previous article in our publication reviewed Phase 1 but we are currently in phase 2 of the EMPP.

 

Lessons from Phase 1

Phase 1 of the EMPP facilitated the immigration of 6 skilled refugees and 9 of their family members. The initial findings of phase 1 have demonstrated that there are skilled refugees who are able to meet the program requirements, however, they face challenges when doing so. Refugees were found to have faced the following challenges when applying as economic immigrants:

  • Regulatory and Legislative Obstacles – As it stands, there are regulatory requirements that prohibit the issuance of work permits to those who are unable to meet the requirements set out in the law. Examples are found under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.
  • Operational Accommodations – There is a need for further examination as to how to make the process, as a whole, smoother for the incoming refugees.
  • Identification of Refugee Skills – The current program is not collecting enough data regarding the incoming refugees’ skills and employment experience, which impacts the determining of eligibility for job opportunities.
  • Access to Information and Awareness – Many refugees are not aware of their options falling under the newer pathways.
  • Job-Matching with Employers in Destination Countries – Refugees are often limited in their ability to make connections with prospective employers (ex: no stable internet connection, etc.) and employers are unaware of the talent that is present in the overseas populations.
  • Financial Requirements – Refugees may not have the funds required to cover the costs associated with economic immigration.

 

Phase 2

The second phase of the EMPP is building upon the lessons learned through Phase 1. Phase 2 of the EMPP is the implementation of public policy which is intended to support the EMPP. The public policy introduces facilitation measures that will remove major displacement-related barriers, thus making it easier for skilled refuges to access economic immigration. This public policy is intended to address the unique challenges that are faced by skilled refugees due to the circumstances of their displacement when applying for the economic immigration pathways to Canada.

The public policy will exempt EMPP clients overseas from some applicable requirements of the Provincial Nominee Class, the Atlantic Immigration Pilot Program, the Atlantic Immigration Class and the Rural and Northern Immigration Pilot economic immigration pathways.

Some of the exemptions include: allowing candidates to apply for the Immigration Loan Program, and to show to financial resources such as grants or loans for which access is not yet in place as part of their financial admissibility;  exemption to the time-bound requirements for work experience selection criteria (allowing significant gaps in the work history); potential exemptions to some documentation requirements and assessment of other evidentiary proof in substitution (for example for proof of work history but not for any required language or educational requirements).

EMPP candidates must still meet the class membership and the selection criteria of one of the above mentioned existing economic classes, in addition to satisfying a processing officer that they can economically establish in Canada. EMPP candidates will immigrate to Canada under one of the existing permanent residence economic classes, and will also be eligible for settlement and integrative services and supports.

Phase 2 of the EMPP is being implemented in two stages. Stage 1 will cap processing at 150 applications from principal applicants and ends June 30, 2022. Stage 2 will cap processing at 350 applications from principal applicants, and begins July 1, 2022.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have further questions about these programs or are an employer seeking to support your workers, please contact a member of our Immigration Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top