Skip to content

Bank of Canada Announces Supervisory Framework for Retail Payments Activities Act

By Kevin Landry and Colton Smith

The Bank of Canada (“BoC”) has announced the supervisory framework (the “Framework”) it will use to oversee payment service providers under the Retail Payments Activities Act.

The Retail Payments Activities Act was enacted by the federal government in June 2021 with the objective of regulating retail payment providers in Canada. See our previous update about it here.

The Role of the Bank of Canada

Under the Retail Payments Activities Act, the BoC has been provided a supervisory authority over payment service providers performing retail payment activities. The BoC’s objectives pursuant to the legislation are to (a) supervise payment service providers to determine their compliance with the Retail Payments Activities Act (b) promote the adoption by payment service providers of policies and procedures intended to ensure compliance, and (c) monitor and evaluate developments and issues in the world of retail payment activities.

How the Bank of Canada’s Supervisory Framework is Outlined

The Framework focuses on three activities: (1) registration, (2) risk monitoring, and (3) enforcement. Supervisory expectations will be informed by the Retail Payments Activities Act, its regulations, and additional guidance that is expected to be published by the BoC to help payment services providers understand their obligations.

(1) Registration

Certain individuals or entities will be required to register with the BoC by submitting an application along with a registration fee. Information regarding the BoC’s approach to fees can be found here.

Under the Framework, the criteria for registration are:

Under the geographic scope criteria, an individual or entity must either have a place of business in Canada or perform retail payment activities for an end user in Canada and direct retail payment activities at individuals or entities that are in Canada.

Individuals and entities excluded from registration include banks and authorized foreign banks (under the Bank Act), credit unions, insurance companies, trust and loan companies, provincially regulated loan companies, payment service providers agents and mandataries and Payments Canada. Transactions involving automatic teller machines and internal transactions between affiliated entities are also excluded activities under the Retail Payments Activities Act.

The BoC is currently developing a web application allowing payment service providers to register, pay fees, update information, and comply with legislated reporting requirements. Registration decisions will be posted on the BoC website, including those where registration is refused or revoked and the reasons why.

Applicant information of individuals and entities who meet the criteria for registration will be shared with the Department of Finance Canada to conduct a national security review and with Financial Transaction and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC).

Applicants will be responsible for responding to requests for information during the applications process as well as keeping their information up to date. Once registered, payment service providers are required to comply with the Retail Payments Activities Act and pay an annual assessment fee.

(2) Risk Monitoring

Under the Retail Payments Activities Act, payment service providers must establish, implement and maintain an operational risk management and incident response framework. Additionally, payment service providers have an obligation to implement certain measures to safeguard end-user funds, if applicable.

The BoC will monitor and assess registered payment service providers performance of the above noted obligations. To do so, payment service providers will be required to submit annual reports, significant change or new activity reports, and incident reports. The BoC will use these reports, along with responses to requests submitted to payment service providers, to assess a payment service providers compliance. Assessment may include, desk reviews, on-site visits, or a special audit, each being more onerous than the last.

(3) Enforcement

The BoC will use a variety of tools to address non-compliance with the Retail Payments Activities Act. These include:

  • A compliance agreement with a payment service provider to rectify non-compliance;
  • A notice of violation accompanied with a monetary penalty;
  • A notice of violation accompanied with an offer to enter into a compliance agreement (which would cut the monetary penalty in half);
  • A compliance order, ordering a payment service provider to stop an action, refrain from taking an action, or to remedy the situation.

The BoC may also apply for a court order requiring a payment service provider to: 1) stop an action that violates the Retail Payments Activities Act, 2) comply with a provision of the Retail Payments Activities Act, or 3) comply with the terms of a compliance order. If a payment service provider disagrees with a notice of refusal of registration, notice of intent to revoke registration, a notice of violation or a notice of default, the payment service provider may appeal the decision to the Governor. If the Governor upholds the decision, a payment service provider may then appeal to the Federal court.

Anticipated Developments

The BoC notes that it may update the supervisor framework before or after the Retail Payments Activities Act comes into force in order to respond to regulations published by the Department of Finance Canada, changes in the retail payments sector, and to respond to lessons learned through the implementation of the Framework. Draft regulations and further guidance are expected to be published by the Department of Finance Canada in 2023.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Perrin v Blake reaffirms the law on contributory negligence and recovery of damages

April 14, 2016

In a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…

Read More

Client Update: Interest arbitration changes for New Brunswick postponed for further study

April 11, 2016

On Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…

Read More

Client Update: Universal interest arbitration proposed for New Brunswick

April 5, 2016

On March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…

Read More

Good Faith Fisheries: New case on Crown consultation & regulation of Aboriginal fisheries

March 22, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…

Read More

Atlantic Employers’ Counsel – Winter 2016

March 10, 2016

THE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…

Read More

Hiring the “Right” Employee

February 24, 2016

By Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…

Read More

Bye, Bye Canadian P.I.?: What Apple’s fight against the FBI means for the protection of Personal Information in Canada

February 23, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2016 Proxy Season

February 12, 2016

In preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Left Sharks and Copy Cats: The Super Bowl’s Impact on Protecting a Brand

February 5, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…

Read More

The Labour Relations of First Nations’ Fisheries: Who gets to decide?

February 2, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top