Skip to content

Client Update: New Brunswick’s final cannabis report: government operated stores, guidance on growing at home

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry

New Brunswick’s Final Report of the Select Committee on Cannabis was released September 1, 2017.

The Committee was appointed by the Legislature of New Brunswick and was mandated to conduct public consultation in New Brunswick regarding recreational cannabis. On June 21, 2017 the Committee released an interim report which we discussed in more detail in our article Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations. In July the Committee hosted public discussion across the province.

The Committee is not the final decision maker. Its mandate was to report to the Legislature a “summary of public consultations on the interim report”.

The following is a summary of the recommendations contained in the Report:

New Brunswick should use a public distributor and government operated stores

The Report recommends that a public distributor sell recreational cannabis through government operated stores:

The New Brunswick Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis studied the legalization of recreational cannabis in Colorado and Washington, who moved directly to a private delivery model that resulted in a large number of private cannabis businesses. These states have since found it difficult to regulate the private sector and keep out the illegal market. Based on these experiences, the Working Group proposes that recreational cannabis be sold through a public distributor in government-operated stores. In the opinion of the Working Group, this poses the best compromise to restrict youth access to recreational cannabis and ensure prices can compete with the illegal market.

The Report comments on, but does not outline clear recommendations for: co-location, municipal zoning, appropriate staff training levels for retailers, or proximity of recreational cannabis sales to locations where children are likely to be present.

The legal age should be 19

The Cannabis Act provides that provincial legislation may depart from various provisions of the Cannabis Act. For example, although the Cannabis Act permits adults as young as 18 to partake in recreational cannabis, the Report recommends that New Brunswick adopt the age of 19:

The federal Cannabis Act sets a minimum age of 18 for the possession and consumption of recreational cannabis. Although 18 will be the minimum legal age in Canada, the provinces and territories can set a higher age limit. The New Brunswick Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis proposes that the legal age be set at 19 to harmonize with the legal age for alcohol and tobacco.

Additional safeguards for personal growing

The Report recommends home cultivators be required to keep cannabis “secure and inaccessible by children or the public” but does not provide clear guidelines about how such measures will be enforced.

Landlords should be permitted to prohibit cultivation

In Nova Scotia, landlords have lobbied to ensure they can prevent cultivation in rental units. The Committee’s report recommends “affirming that landlords are free to prohibit the cultivation of recreational cannabis”.

Home cultivation should not be permitted in all residences

The Report also recommends that New Brunswick depart from the Cannabis Act with respect to the types of households where cultivation can take place. The Report recommends that cultivation should not be permitted to take place in a shared living spaces such as a university residence building.

The Cannabis Act, provides that an individual who “is 18 years of age or older” may “cultivate, propagate or harvest” or offer to “cultivate, propagate or harvest” not more than “four cannabis plants at any one time in their dwelling house.

The definition of “dwelling-house” in the Cannabis Act is broad and would normally include any part of a building being occupied as a residence:

dwelling-house means the whole or any part of a building or structure that is kept or occupied as a permanent or temporary residence, and includes

(a) a building within the curtilage of a dwelling-house that is connected to it by a doorway or by a covered and enclosed passage-way, and

(b) a unit that is designed to be mobile and to be used as a permanent or temporary residence and that is being used as such a residence; (maison d’habitation)

The Report, however, suggests defining “household” for the purposes of home cultivation, as “a housing unit that has bathing and kitchen facilities (and therefore excludes a room in a rooming house or in a university residence building or other shared living spaces)”.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top