Skip to content

Client Update: Time’s Ticking: Not-for-Profit Corporations

By October 17, 2014 existing not-for-profit corporations incorporated under Part II of the Canada Corporations Act (the “Old Act”) are required to be continued under the new Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (the “New Act”) or face the possibility of automatic administrative dissolution. For those corporations that are also registered charities, dissolution could mean the revocation of their registration as a charity which could result in substantial tax penalties.

 

FEATURES OF THE NEW ACT

Generally the New Act has been modernized to conform with modern business corporation statutes. The New Act now provides a clear set of rules that govern the internal affairs of corporations under its jurisdiction including clear and coherent statements of member rights, rules regarding members and directors meetings, and provides specific rules regarding fundamental changes (amalgamation, continuance, liquidation and dissolution). The New Act also provides a benefit to those individuals who are acting as directors in that it sets out a due diligence defense for certain liability resulting from director negligence.

There is additional oversight under the New Act including the requirement to submit all bylaws and amendments thereto to Industry Canada. There are also financial reporting requirements under the New Act. For non-soliciting corporations with annual gross revenues in excess of $1,000,000 or for soliciting corporations with annual gross revenues in excess of $250,000, a full annual audit must be conducted. For those soliciting corporations with revenues between $50,000 and $250,000, an audit is required unless the members resolve that a review engagement is sufficient. For non-soliciting corporations with gross annual revenues under $1,000,000 or for soliciting corporations with revenues under $50,000, a review engagement is required unless the members resolve that one is not required. These records must be made available to members, directors and officers of the corporation and to Industry Canada. Soliciting corporations must make their financial records publically available.

 

PROCESS OF TRANSITION

Many of our clients may be involved as a director or in an advisory capacity for a not-for-profit corporation incorporated under the Old Act. We would strongly encourage corporations who have not started the continuance process under the New Act should act now to ensure the process is completed in time. For those corporations incorporated under the Old Act which are also registered charities, additional steps are required – particularly if the charity is looking to amend its purposes as part of the transition for which pre-approval from Canada Revenue Agency can take upwards of two to three months before the continuance process can be started under the New Act.

If your corporation has not yet transitioned, it is a fairly simplified process under the New Act. The corporation must replace its letters patent, supplementary letters patent (if any) and by laws with new charter documents which are in compliance with the New Act. The corporation must submit articles of continuance, forms confirming the initial registered office and first directors of the corporation and a name search confirmation. Bylaws which are in compliance with the New Act can either be submitted as part of the initial package or within twelve months of continuance following approval by the members.

Following successful transition under the New Act, all registered charities (including those who have not amended its purposes and even those who have obtained pre-approval from the Canada Revenue Agency) must submit the certificate of continuance, articles of continuance, various filing forms as well as a copy of the current bylaws and statement of current purposes to the Canada Revenue Agency.

The foregoing is intended for general information only and is not intended as legal advice. If you have any questions, contact one of our Business Lawyers.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top