Skip to content

COVID-19 vaccination soon to become mandatory in all federally regulated workplaces in Canada

Brian Johnston, QC and Katharine Mack

COVID-19 vaccination policies have become more prevalent. Public sector employees have been mandated to get vaccinated in a number of jurisdictions, the federal government has mandated vaccinations in the marine and transportation industries, and some provincial governments have required vaccination in other high-risk sectors such as healthcare. Additionally, many private sector employers have voluntarily established vaccination requirements for employees and patrons.

Most recently, the federal government announced that it is developing COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations under the Canada Labour Code, which would come into effect in early 2022. The regulations would require that employees be vaccinated across all federally regulated industries, including banking, broadcasting and telecommunications. Indigenous Governing Bodies and First Nation Band Councils will be exempt in recognition of the right to self-determination and self-government.

If enacted as announced, the COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations will require that federally regulated employers verify vaccination status of all employees – affecting approximately 955,000 employees across Canada. Exemptions would be available to employees for reasons protected by the Canadian Human Rights Act. Employers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement could be subject to administrative monetary penalties.

Last week, there were a few days of consultations with select federal employers and associations. As well a consultation paper has been released.

Concerns have been expressed with this federal initiative including the expected negative impact on industries where labour is already in short supply (e.g. transportation). Some have suggested the Saskatchewan approach as an alternative where employers have the option but are not required to implement mandatory vaccinations. In Saskatchewan, for those employers who opt to implement a policy, legislation and regulations broadly backstops them so long as their actions in implementing and administering the mandatory vaccination policies and other measures are carried out in good faith, whether reasonable or not.

Concerns have also been raised with respect to lack of meaningful engagement, guidance and clarity from the federal government. For example, there have been ongoing challenges for employers in navigating exemption requests on the basis of human rights grounds including disability and religion. While these issues are complex and sometimes emotional, federal employers have been left to respond to these requests in the absence of meaningful guidance from the government nor any promise of a legal backstop to protect employers from legal challenges where they have acted in good faith.

If you have questions, or would like to implement a vaccination policy tailored to your organization, please reach out to a member of our Labour and Employment Group for assistance.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Universal interest arbitration proposed for New Brunswick

April 5, 2016

On March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…

Read More

Good Faith Fisheries: New case on Crown consultation & regulation of Aboriginal fisheries

March 22, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…

Read More

Atlantic Employers’ Counsel – Winter 2016

March 10, 2016

THE EDITORS’ CORNER Michelle Black and Sean Kelly One day, the line between mental and physical disabilities may not be so pronounced, but, for now, distinctions are still drawn between Employee A with, for example, diabetes and…

Read More

Hiring the “Right” Employee

February 24, 2016

By Lisa Gallivan Employees can be your biggest asset, if you hire the right people. This can often be one of the biggest decisions that you make as a business owner or employer. The “right” employee…

Read More

Bye, Bye Canadian P.I.?: What Apple’s fight against the FBI means for the protection of Personal Information in Canada

February 23, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Kathleen Leighton Order Up: Apple, P.I. Recently, the public safety versus personal privacy debate has been brought to main headlines. Apple is facing a court order (available here) requiring the company to assist the FBI in the investigation of…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2016 Proxy Season

February 12, 2016

In preparing for the 2016 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to and interactions with your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Left Sharks and Copy Cats: The Super Bowl’s Impact on Protecting a Brand

February 5, 2016

By Burtley Francis and Michael MacIsaac You remember Left Shark… The Super Bowl is a lot of things to a lot of people and is arguably the most anticipated event of the year that is not a holiday…

Read More

The Labour Relations of First Nations’ Fisheries: Who gets to decide?

February 2, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Summary The Canada Industrial Relations Board recently held that it had no jurisdiction as a federal board to certify a bargaining unit comprised of fisheries employees of the Waycobah First Nation. The decision…

Read More

Can an employer prohibit tattoos and piercings?

January 21, 2016

By Peter McLellan, QC In the 1970s the issue for employers was long hair and sideburns. In the 1980’s it was earrings for men. Today the employer’s concerns are with tattoos and facial piercings. What are…

Read More

Settling for it: Two new NS decisions on settlement agreements and releases

January 15, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor Introduction It sounds simple: Two disputing parties, hoping to resolve their disagreement without drawn-out court proceedings, will mutually agree to a settlement on clear terms; release each other from all claims; and move…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top