Skip to content

Federal Government, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador clearing the way for offshore wind development

Sadira Jan, Dave Randell, and James Gamblin

Nova Scotia (“NS”) and Newfoundland and Labrador (“NL”) are positioned to become international leaders in offshore wind and green hydrogen. Each province has expansive offshores areas, abundant wind resources and mature regulatory regimes for offshore petroleum development that are being expanded to regulate offshore wind and hydrogen development. This article will discuss how the Federal Government, NS and NL have opened the door for the development of offshore wind and associated green hydrogen production. These energy sources will help meet Canada’s clean energy needs and the energy needs of Canada’s international partners.

Regulation of Offshore Development in NS and NL

In April, 2022 it was announced that the Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (“C-NSOPB”) and Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (“C-NLOPB”) would each be modernized with expanded mandates to include the regulation of offshore wind and green hydrogen production. Each board will be renamed to reflect their expanded mandates.

Oil and gas activities in the offshore areas of NS and NL have been regulated through the CNSOPB and CNLOPB for the past thirty years. The boards are jointly organized by the Federal Government and each of NS and NL in light of concurrent or unsettled provincial and federal responsibility over offshore areas. Currently, the boards regulate all aspects of oil and gas projects in the offshore, including licensing, compliance, exploration and decommissioning. It is expected that the reconstituted boards will have similar regulatory jurisdiction for offshore wind and green hydrogen projects.

Regional Impact Assessment for NS and NL Offshore

Currently, the Federal Impact Assessment Agency of Canada is working with indigenous groups, NS and NL on developing Regional Assessments for offshore wind development under the Impact Assessment Act, SC 2019, c. 28, s. 1 (the “IAA”). Impact Assessments under the IAA are undertaken in areas where development is anticipated in the future in order to coordinate the planning and management of future project-level impact assessments. Regional Impact Assessments, once developed, will also inform and create efficiencies for future project-level assessments in the NS and NL offshore areas.

The offshore areas of NS and NL are composed of lands subject to Provincial and Federal jurisdiction. Accordingly, the IAA provides that the Federal Government may enter into an agreement with a province to jointly establish a committee to conduct a Regional Assessment (IAA, s. 93(1)). Terms of reference for a joint committee, including the timeframe for the completion of the Regional Assessment must be developed (IAA, s. 93(3)) before the work of the Regional Assessment can commence. It is expected that draft agreements between the Federal Government and NS and NL, respectively, and draft committee terms of reference will be released for indigenous and public review and comment in October 2022.  The agreements and terms of reference are expected to be finalized before the end of 2022, with Regional Assessment work to begin in January 2023. Further, it is expected that the Regional Assessment will be complete within approximately 18 months.

The portion of the Canada-Nova Scotia offshore area forming part of the Regional Assessment study area is excerpted in at Figure 1, below.

Figure 1[1]

Notably, the Bay of Fundy is excluded from the study area as tidal energy development is underway in this region.

With this timeframe in mind, NS has announced a target to offer leases for five gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030 to support the development of the green hydrogen industry. The first call for bids is scheduled to be in 2025. Once the five gigawatt target is met, subsequent calls for bids will be based on market opportunities. NS will also be releasing a hydrogen action plan in 2023 in support of its ongoing work in the area.

The push by NS and NL to develop offshore wind forms part of each provinces broader push to develop clean energy sources. In August, 2022, NS awarded contracts for five onshore wind projects expected to generate a total of 372 megawatts or 1,373 gigawatt hours per year of electricity representing approximately 12 per cent of total energy consumption for NS.

In 2022, NL removed barriers to the development of onshore wind projects, signaling a major shift in its energy policy. See our “Winds of Change” series for a detailed discussion of the state of onshore wind development in NL.


Sadira Jan is a partner in the Halifax office, with a practice focusing on renewable energy, financing transactions, mergers and acquisitions, as well as general corporate law. Sadie has extensive experience acting as lead counsel for onshore wind development projects and acts in the development, implementation and testing of tidal power in Atlantic Canada.  She has been recognized by Lexpert in Energy law (electricity).

Dave Randell is a partner in the Halifax office, with extensive experience across various industries including energy,  insurance, mining, media, manufacturing and technology. He has acted as lead advisor for a number of noteworthy Canadian and international clients in the energy sector.

James Gamblin is an associate in the Halifax office, with a practice in the areas of renewable energy, leasing, mergers and acquisitions and general corporate law. Jamie’s practice focuses advising clients regarding legislative and regulatory compliance. Jamie has a policy background, and holds Master’s degree in Public Policy and Public Administration.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have any questions on the above we would invite you to contact the authors or any other member of our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

[1] Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, “Regional Assessment of Offshore Wind Development in Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia: Regional Assessment Planning Workshop – July 2022”, online: https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/documents/p83514/144523E.pdf

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top