Skip to content

Government of Newfoundland and Labrador creates protected leave of absence amidst COVID-19

Twila Reid and Sarah Byrne

On March 26, 2020, the Newfoundland House of Assembly met with a minimum quorum of members to table and pass Bill 33 – COVID-19 Pandemic Response Act (“Act”).

This omnibus bill amended a number of pieces of legislation, including the Labour Standards Act. The amendments added Part VII.8 – Communicable Disease Emergency Leave (“Part”) to the Act, and set a retroactive commencement date for the amendments to the Act as March 14, 2020.

With respect to designated communicable diseases, of which COVID-19 is expected to be one, this Part creates an entitlement, upon presentation of reasonable evidence, to an unpaid leave of absence where employees are unable to perform their duties in situations where an employee is:

  • under medical investigation, supervision, or treatment;
  • acting in accordance with an order under the Public Health Protection and Promotion Act;
  • in isolation, quarantine, or under any control measure issued by the Chief Medical Officer of Health;
  • under an employer’s direction in response to a concern that the employee may expose others in the workplace;
  • providing care or support to family, including such situations as school or child care service closure; or
  • affected by travel restrictions and, under the circumstances, cannot reasonably be expected to travel back to the province.

However, the amendment provides for classes of employees to be exempted by regulation.

The amendments protect employees who take, apply for, or intend to take this leave of absence, but the period of absence will not count towards the application of rights, benefits, and privileges addressed in the Act, unless explicitly agreed upon by the employer and the employee. However, upon the conclusion of the leave of absence, all rights, benefits, and privileges addressed in the Act will resume and will be deemed to be continuous with the period of work before the leave taken.

These amendments suggest an intention to create protections for employees who have to take leave as a result of COVID-19, including those who contract the virus as well as those who have to care for family due to the resulting circumstances. However, employers and employees alike anxiously await regulations which are expected to determine that COVID-19 is a designated communicable disease under the Act, and provide any employee classes who are to be exempted from this leave.


This article is provided for general information only. 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top