Pensions & Employee Benefits Update: Nova Scotia pension funding framework & regulatory review
Peter McLellan, QC & Level Chan
In September 2017, Nova Scotia’s Department of Finance and Treasury Board announced that stakeholder input is being sought regarding potential permanent changes to the funding framework for defined benefit pension plans for Nova Scotia.
There is no indication as to any preferred course of action for Nova Scotia; however the discussion paper does summarize what has been done in the past in Nova Scotia – predominantly temporary solvency relief (and permanent solvency relief for certain quasi-public sector plans) – and also references what has been done in other jurisdictions, notable Ontario and Quebec. This is an important opportunity for sponsors of defined benefit pension plans in Nova Scotia to have input on the regime on a go forward basis in Nova Scotia:
- Do we maintain the status quo (full solvency funding)?
- Do we eliminate solvency funding and enhance going concern funding (e.g. the Ontario approach)?
- Do we reduce solvency funding – i.e. from 100% to 85%?
Input is also being sought on a number of regulatory issues including:
- Should Nova Scotia proceed with providing for target benefit plans? If so, should they be restricted to unionized workplaces and should defined benefit plans be permitted to convert to target benefit plans, including accrued benefits?
- What restrictions should apply to annuity buy-outs?
- Should Nova Scotia mirror or adopt recently updated federal investment regulations?
The Province has set a deadline of Friday, November 10, 2017 for stakeholder input.
Our Pensions and Employee Benefits Group would be pleased to discuss this review with you and to assist in any submissions to be made to the Province.
Archive
In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3 the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…
Read MorePerlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…
Read MoreJonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…
Read MoreRick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…
Read MoreBrian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…
Read MoreJonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…
Read More