Pensions & Employee Benefits Update: Nova Scotia pension funding framework & regulatory review
Peter McLellan, QC & Level Chan
In September 2017, Nova Scotia’s Department of Finance and Treasury Board announced that stakeholder input is being sought regarding potential permanent changes to the funding framework for defined benefit pension plans for Nova Scotia.
There is no indication as to any preferred course of action for Nova Scotia; however the discussion paper does summarize what has been done in the past in Nova Scotia – predominantly temporary solvency relief (and permanent solvency relief for certain quasi-public sector plans) – and also references what has been done in other jurisdictions, notable Ontario and Quebec. This is an important opportunity for sponsors of defined benefit pension plans in Nova Scotia to have input on the regime on a go forward basis in Nova Scotia:
- Do we maintain the status quo (full solvency funding)?
- Do we eliminate solvency funding and enhance going concern funding (e.g. the Ontario approach)?
- Do we reduce solvency funding – i.e. from 100% to 85%?
Input is also being sought on a number of regulatory issues including:
- Should Nova Scotia proceed with providing for target benefit plans? If so, should they be restricted to unionized workplaces and should defined benefit plans be permitted to convert to target benefit plans, including accrued benefits?
- What restrictions should apply to annuity buy-outs?
- Should Nova Scotia mirror or adopt recently updated federal investment regulations?
The Province has set a deadline of Friday, November 10, 2017 for stakeholder input.
Our Pensions and Employee Benefits Group would be pleased to discuss this review with you and to assist in any submissions to be made to the Province.
Archive
Damages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…
Read MoreGrant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…
Read MoreRick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…
Read MoreJonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…
Read MoreBruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…
Read More