Skip to content

Reuniting with family: who can come to Canada despite COVID-19 restrictions?

Brittany Trafford

The Canadian borders have been restricted for over a year now and many families have struggled with being separated. Throughout 2020 and early 2021 restrictions have fluctuated as the federal government tried to balance their recognition of the importance of family reunification, with the risks of the pandemic. After many months missing immediate and extended family members, people in Canada are looking for ways to come together with their relatives.

While everyone is waiting with much anticipation for changes to the travel restrictions as vaccines roll out, this article explores the current state of the federal travel restrictions in Canada and how it impacts family reunification. In some cases, though much more difficult than normal, it is possible for family members to finally gather together. Knowing the steps to take and who is eligible to enter Canada will help families plan ahead and avoid disappointment.

Coming to Canada: who is eligible?

The requirements for family members to enter Canada depends on a number of factors including: 1) the immigration status of the family member in Canada; 2) the relationship between the individuals separated; and, 3) the location of the family member outside Canada.

In some cases, provincial restrictions also prohibit family members from reuniting; for example, New Brunswick restricts all “unnecessary travel” which would include entering the province to visit a family member. Similarly, Nova Scotia is also currently restricting entrance to the province to “essential travel” only, which does not include visiting people in the province including family members. These provincial requirements may relax as provinces open up; however, it is essential to consider any provincial restrictions that will prohibit travel into the region, even if approved for entrance by Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) and by the Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”).

This article focuses only on federal restrictions and we encourage you to seek guidance on the particulars of the province of destination before travelling, especially as the provincial restrictions frequently fluctuate as provinces react to their circumstances and the third wave of the pandemic.

A) Immediate family members of Canadians and permanent residents

Immediate family members of Canadians and permanent residents (“PRs”) of Canada are eligible to enter the country under federal exemptions. An immediate family member includes:

  • a spouse or common-law partner
  • dependent children (in most cases children under 22 years old)
  • dependent children of a dependent child
  • parents or step-parents
  • parents or step-parents of the spouse or common-law partner
  • guardians or tutors

They must show evidence that they are eligible to enter Canada when boarding a plane and upon arrival at the port of entry. This evidence will include:

  • Evidence of the status of the Canadian or permanent resident in Canada (i.e. copy of passport, citizenship certificate, birth certificate or PR card)
  • Proof of the relationship to the immediate family member (i.e. marriage certificate, proof of common-law status, or birth certificates for children listing the Canadian/PR parent)
  • Evidence that they intend to stay in Canada for more than 15 days (if they are travelling for a non-discretionary reason, like a pure visit)

Where the travel is for less than 15 days, the purpose of the travel should be for a non-optional or non-discretionary reason, which means it cannot be for tourism or a recreational purpose.

These family members will be subject to the normal travel requirements such as needing a visa or electronic travel authorization if not a US citizen. They are also subject to quarantine requirements and pre and post-arrival COVID-19 testing requirements. They will need to show that they have a suitable quarantine plan which may include an approved hotel booking where the individual enters Canada by flight.

B) Extended family members of Canadians or permanent residents of Canada

In some cases, an extended family member of a permanent resident or Canadian may be able to enter Canada. An extended family member includes the following:

  • an individual who is 18 years of age or older, is in an exclusive dating relationship with the Canadian/PR (who is also 18 years of age or older), has been in such a relationship for at least one year and has spent time in the physical presence of the person during the course of the relationship
  • a dependent child of the person in the exclusive dating relationship
  • a child of the Canadian/PR (other than a dependent child) or a child of their spouse or common-law partner or of the person in the exclusive dating relationship
  • a dependent child of a child (a grandchild)
  • a sibling, half-sibling or step-sibling of the Canadian/PR or of the Canadian/PR’s spouse or common-law partner
  • a grandparent of the Canadian/PR or of the Canadian/PR’s spouse or common-law partner

These individuals must be entering for more than 15 days (if they are travelling for a non-discretionary reason, like a pure visit), and will need to sign a statutory declaration before a notary swearing to their relationship. They will then submit the declaration and supporting documents to IRCC to obtain written authorization confirming their eligibility to enter Canada. They must have the written authorization to show the CBSA officers upon arrival. They will be required to obtain a visa or electronic travel authorization if not a US citizen. They will also be required to follow all quarantine and testing requirements for entrance to the country.

C) Immediate family members of temporary residents in Canada

In recognition of the importance of family reunification, the government has also allowed some exemptions for family members of individuals who are in Canada with temporary status (on work permits or study permits or as a visitor). The process is a bit different than that used for immediate family members of Canadians and the exemption only applies to immediate family members, not to extended family members. Immediate family members include those listed under section A above.

In order to enter the country from the United States, the rules merely state that the foreign national cannot enter for an optional or discretionary reason. Therefore, the foreign national cannot enter Canada for tourism or entertainment purposes, but may be able to make an argument for entry in other cases. Generally, this exemption will apply when an immediate family member is entering to take up longer term or permanent residence with their immediate family member while they are in Canada, rather than for a vacation. They do not require a written authorization, but must have documentation to prove their relationship to the temporary resident in Canada (or with whom they are entering), evidence that the family member has status in Canada (i.e. a copy of the work permit or study permit), and evidence to support their purpose of entry.

 

If the family member is entering Canada from outside the United States, they will require written authorization to enter Canada and will need to show they are entering for the purposes of family reunification. They must request the authorization online from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The processing time can take about 14 days. They will need to provide evidence that the person in Canada has status here, that they are an immediate family member and that their travel is non-discretionary. In most cases, the travel will be to reunite and reside with the family member. The traveller must have their electronic travel authorization or visitor visa, depending on their country of citizenship. They will need the written approval in order to board the plane to Canada and to show CBSA upon arrival.

Immediate family members of temporary residents in Canada are subject to all other restrictions, including quarantine requirements and pre and post-arrival COVID-19 testing.

D) Entrance for compassionate grounds (funerals and caregiving)

Finally, it is important to recognize that some family members may need to enter the country for compassionate purposes. The situation must meet the exemptions set out in the Orders in Council that include: to provide care to a Canadian, permanent resident or temporary resident who has been deemed critically ill by a medical professional or deemed to require medical support; or, to attend a funeral or end of life ceremony.

In order to be exempted from the travel restrictions and normal quarantine requirements, the individual would need to obtain pre-approval from the Public Health Agency of Canada, which can be obtained through an online application that includes providing evidence of the medical condition or death, letter of support for caring for someone at end of life and a site visit authorization form from the places the foreign national will attend (including care facilities, hospitals and funeral homes).

Conclusion

Canada’s travel requirements will potentially be changing this summer through a phased approach, including a gradual lifting of travel restrictions and quarantine requirements.  However, even under the current restrictions there may be ways for families to reunite following a difficult year as people become more confident in travelling and are looking to finally see their loved ones.

Because of the frequent changes and additional provincial restrictions that are in flux, we recommend you seek immigration advice on travel eligibility and required steps before planning your trip. Our team of immigration lawyers is happy to help.


This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Immigration group.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top