Skip to content

Significant Amendments to the Business Corporations Act (New Brunswick) Proposed

By Paul SmithDave Randell and Graham Haynes

On June 9, 2022, the Government of New Brunswick (“GNB”) released a consultation paper entitled Proposal to Modernize the Business Corporations Act (the “Proposal”) which outlines several significant amendments to the Business Corporations Act (New Brunswick) (the “NBBCA”). If adopted, these amendments would add to the existing and create new, competitive advantages to incorporating and doing business in New Brunswick.

The release of the Proposal was followed on June 10, 2022, by GNB proclaiming into force Bill 95, which amends the NBBCA to require corporations incorporated in New Brunswick to maintain a register of individuals with significant control over the corporation, i.e., a beneficial ownership registry. A separate client update by our Firm on this topic is forthcoming.

Background

The NBBCA was enacted in New Brunswick in 1981. At the time of its enactment, the NBBCA represented progressive legislation and created competitive advantages for professional service providers in the province. However, the statute has not maintained its once-enviable status as the most business-friendly legislation in the country and other provinces have, in recent decades, adopted similar provisions and established their own unique advantages.

In 2015, stakeholders, including Stewart McKelvey, proposed a suite of changes to the NBBCA to revitalize its competitive position. Unfortunately, these proposals were never adopted. However, in recent consultation with GNB, these changes have been reintroduced, along with other suggested progressive amendments, culminating in the Proposal.

Key Changes

The purpose of this client update is not to identify or summarize all of the relevant changes to the NBBCA proposed in the Proposal (a link to the 137 page Proposal can be found here) but rather to highlight some key changes which practitioners and stakeholders should be aware of:

1. Unlimited Liability Corporations: A historic competitive advantage of the Nova Scotia Companies Act, an unlimited liability corporation (a “ULC”) has long been an innovative and tax-efficient vehicle used by international investors, especially those in based in the US, to invest in Canada. The Proposal introduces a new part allowing for ULCs to be incorporated under the NBBCA to bring it into competition with Nova Scotia, Alberta, British Columbia and Prince Edward Island.

2. Repeal of Financial Assistance Restrictions. New Brunswick is one of the only jurisdictions in Canada which still contains restrictions on certain forms of financial assistance between related corporations. The Proposal will repeal these provisions in line with the reforms from other Canadian jurisdictions.

3. Limiting Preemptive Rights: The NBBCA provides that the shareholders of a corporation have anti-dilutive pre-emptive rights in respect of any subsequent issuance of shares of the corporation unless the articles of the corporation specifically precludes their application. The provisions added in the Proposal will eliminate such pre-emptive rights for all corporations incorporated after the date of coming into force of the legislation unless the articles of the corporation specifically provides for them – this essentially changes from system from one of opt-out to one of opt-in.

4. Limiting Cumulative Voting: Currently, the NBBCA provides that minority shareholders can use their votes cumulatively in order to elect directors of a corporation. This cumbersome voting system is inconsistent with modern corporate expectations and practice. The Proposal will similarly eliminate the application of mandatory cumulative voting for all corporations incorporated after the date of coming into force of the legislation unless the articles of the corporation specifically provides for it.

5. Directorless Corporations: Corporations are typically incorporated with a board of directors who are responsible for overseeing and executing the strategic direction of the company. However, in modern corporate practice, it is not uncommon for the power of directors to be usurped by a unanimous shareholders agreement which redirects said authority and responsibilities to the shareholders. The Proposal introduces a new part allowing for directorless corporations to be incorporated in certain circumstances, in which case the shareholders are empowered and accountable as directors.

6. Corporate Directors: While directors of a corporation are generally understood to be the individuals responsible for the corporation, the Proposal will allow shareholders to appoint corporate directors to the board of a corporation in certain circumstances. In such circumstances, the directors of that body corporate will then be responsible as an individual director otherwise would be.

7. Due Diligence Defence: A clear due diligence defence for directors will be added to the NBBCA and the good faith defence currently existing under the legislation will be adjusted to bring it into line with provisions at the federal level and in the province of Ontario.

8. Fundamental Changes: Several changes to the fundamental changes part of the NBBCA will be amended, including provisions which achieve the following:

a. Short-Form Amalgamations: Non-wholly owned subsidiaries will be able to be amalgamated under the short-form amalgamation process.

b. Arrangements: The definition of arrangement will be broadened, including permitting a Court to order an arrangement to proceed notwithstanding that it could be affected under another provision of the NBBCA.

c. Companies Act: A corporation incorporated under the NBBCA will be permitted to continue under the Companies Act (New Brunswick) to become a non-profit organization.

9. Take Over Bids. Section 134 of the NBBCA currently provides that when an offer is made for less than all of the shares of any class of a corporation which would result in the purchaser having majority control, that offer must also be made to all the other shareholders of the class – essentially providing all minority shareholders with a statutory tag-along right. This provision was relatively unique to New Brunswick. The Proposal, recognizing the advancements in securities laws for reporting issuers and that, for private corporations, such matters are more appropriately handled in a shareholders’ agreement, proposes the repeal of this provision.

10. Ancillary Corporate Changes: There are certain other miscellaneous changes under the Proposal which further its goal of enhanced legal efficiency and innovation in New Brunswick:

a. Promissory Note Consideration: It will be clarified that a promissory note received from an arm’s length party is acceptable consideration for the issue of a share of a corporation in New Brunswick.

b. Uncertificated Shares: Corporations in New Brunswick will have further and express statutory basis to issue shares in uncertificated form.

c. Board Appointments Outside of Meetings: The directors of a board will be permitted to increase the size of the board of directors by up to one-third in between meetings of shareholders.

d. Electronic Meetings: The use of virtual directors’ and shareholders meetings and electronic communications will be reaffirmed.

e. Financial Reporting. It will be expressly recognized that financial statements may be sent to shareholders by posting them on a website or internet file hosting service that can be accessed for free.

f. Corporate Trustees. The prohibition against a corporation acting in various fiduciary capacities (trustee, executor, guardian, etc.) will be lifted in certain circumstances, including in the context of a family trust.

11. Dissolution and Revival: The Proposal provides that a corporation can voluntarily dissolve in more circumstances, including when a corporation has made adequate provision for the payment of its liabilities, and that an interested person may revive a corporation that has been dissolved.

12. Appointment of Director: The Proposal states the Director under the NBBCA shall be appointed by Service New Brunswick rather than by the Lieutenant-Governor in Council.

Next Steps

Following a period during which stakeholders and the public can provide their comments on the Proposal, it is expected that GNB will adopt some or all of the amendments proposed thereunder through the introduction of legislation amending the NBBCA. Our Firm will continue to monitor and comment on such developments.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Corporate Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


 

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top