Skip to content

Final cannabis edibles, topicals and extracts regulations released

Kevin Landry

On June 14, 2019, Health Canada announced the release of the final version of amendments to the Cannabis Regulations, which will permit for the production and sale of edibles, extracts and topicals.

The announcement follows recent changes to the cannabis licensing regime and was preceded by a 60-day consultation period on the strict regulation of additional cannabis products that opened in December 2018 (see our articled titled Canada’s Proposed Cannabis Edibles, Extracts and Topicals Regulations Revealed for more information).  

The announcement came with the release of a document titled Final Regulations for New Cannabis Products: Edible Cannabis, Cannabis Extracts and Cannabis Topicals.

What has changed from the proposed regulations?

Implementation and important dates

Several important deadlines were noted in the announcement:

  1. June 26, 2019 – the amendments to the Cannabis Regulations will be published in the Canada Gazette Part II.
  2. July 15, 2019 – license holders may submit requests for license amendments to permit production and sale of edibles, topicals and extracts. For processors licensed to sell already it is expected that amendments will be completed within 60 days.
  3. October 17, 2019 – edibles, extracts and topicals amendments to the Cannabis Regulations will take effect. Edibles, extracts and topicals will be added to Schedule 4 of the Cannabis Act and will be permitted as new classes of cannabis. Written notice of new edible, extract or topical cannabis products may be given to Health Canada pursuant to s. 244 of the Cannabis Regulations.
  4. December 16, 2019 – earliest date new products will be available for sale due to the 60-day notice period in s. 244 of the Cannabis Regulations.

Separate facilities required

The final regulations prohibit any class of cannabis from being manufactured at the same “site” as food products. It should be noted that the definition of “site” in the Cannabis Regulations is defined as an “area that is used exclusively by the holder (of the license) and that consists of at least one building or one part of a building”.

THC limits

Multi-packs of edible and drinkable cannabis will be permitted in the final regulations. The total quantity of THC in any multi-pack must not exceed 10 milligrams, and the total size of the multi-pack must not exceed 30 grams of dried cannabis or equivalent. Multi-packs will need to be comprised of discrete units that are consistent except for flavor and colour.

Packaging and labelling restrictions

Fold out panels permitted on labels

Panels can be provided on packages if the product is too small to provide all the required information but cannot display additional brand elements.

Equivalency and concentration to be included on labels

An “equivalency to dried cannabis” calculation in line with the deemed conversion table in s. 21(3) of the Cannabis Regulations will be required on every label in order to allow consumers to facilitate consumer compliance with personal possession limits.

THC and CBD concentrations have been standardized and must be displayed on packages in “milligrams per gram”.

Pressurized containers permitted

The proposed prohibition on pressurized containers (e.g. metered-dose inhalers) will not form part of the final Regulations, as pressurized containers are subject to controls to regulate their safety under the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act.

Further promotion restrictions

Association with flavours

Additional restrictions have been added to prevent promotion or images on labels of cannabis extracts, or cannabis accessories containing cannabis extracts that associate those products with flavours listed in the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act such as confectionary, dessert, soft drinks and energy drinks.

Creating health impressions

Restrictions were also added to prevent promotions or images on labels that creates an impression that:

  1. health or cosmetic benefits may be derived from the service or the use of cannabis or a cannabis accessory.
  2. edible cannabis meets particular dietary requirements for young persons, or those:
    1. with a physiological condition as a result of a disease, disorder or injury;
    2. for whom a particular effect, including weight loss, is to be obtained by a controlled intake of food;

No association with alcohol, tobacco or vaping products

Promotions or labels associating cannabis products with alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, or vaping products are prohibited.

Promotions at age-gated events cannot be seen or heard outside event

New restrictions clarify that promotions in places where “young persons are not permitted by law” may not be audible or visible to young persons from outside the age-gated event.

Limitations on promotional items (swag)

In addition to current restrictions on utilizing items appealing to youth or associated with daring or adventurous lifestyles, any swag would now be limited to the display of only 1 brand element on a particular item. Further, the brand element will be restricted in size to an area equal to or smaller than 300 cm² and no letter may be larger than 4 cm high.

Display of brand elements

The amendments also restrict display of brand elements on any item that is “in a school, a public playground, a daycare facility or any other public place frequented mainly by young persons, or is visible from such a place”.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact a member of our Cannabis group.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top