Introducing the Construction Remedies Act
Kenneth McCullogh, QC and Conor O’Neil, P.Eng.
On December 18, 2020, the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick passed the Construction Remedies Act. After nearly a year the new legislation will come into force on Monday, November 1, 2021. Our update outlining some of the major differences between the Construction Remedies Act and its predecessor, the Mechanics’ Lien Act is available online here.
Transition provisions
The new act will apply to all contracts entered into on or after November 1, 2021. Despite the repeal of the Mechanics’ Lien Act, that legislation will continue to apply to any contracts entered into before November 1, 2021. In other words, any contracts currently being performed will not be subject to a change in law.
Almost all of the sections of the Construction Remedies Act will come into force on November 1, with some exceptions. Importantly, the provisions which require an owner of a construction project to create a holdback trust account, which could prove to be administratively burdensome to many owners, will not come into force on November 1. It is expected that there will be changes made to the regulations and that these sections will come into force on a later date.
The regulations, which are now available online here, prescribe new forms to be used for filings of liens and projects where mandatory surety bonding is required on Crown or local government projects.
What’s next
It could still be several months before the effects of the new legislation are known in practice. Given that the transitional provisions flow with the dates of contracts parties managing several projects should pay careful attention to the dates of those contracts to determine which legislation applies.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about how the information above may affect you, please contact any member of our construction group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Jon O’Kane and Jamie Watson Legal cannabis will have numerous implications for insurers. The federal Cannabis Act (discussed here), the provincial acts (discussed here) and the regulations (discussed here) are all going to add layers…
Read MoreVasu Sivapalan and Ben Whitney Legalized and regulated cannabis is on track to become a reality in Canada in just under a year (on or before July 1, 2018). This will create a number of…
Read MoreFurther to our Client Update on June 15 titled, “Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick”, the deadline for initial registration under the Lobbyists’ Registration Act of New Brunswick has been extended from…
Read MoreBy Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…
Read MoreNew Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…
Read MoreBy Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…
Read MoreOn April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…
Read More