Introducing the Construction Remedies Act
Kenneth McCullogh, QC and Conor O’Neil, P.Eng.
On December 18, 2020, the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick passed the Construction Remedies Act. After nearly a year the new legislation will come into force on Monday, November 1, 2021. Our update outlining some of the major differences between the Construction Remedies Act and its predecessor, the Mechanics’ Lien Act is available online here.
Transition provisions
The new act will apply to all contracts entered into on or after November 1, 2021. Despite the repeal of the Mechanics’ Lien Act, that legislation will continue to apply to any contracts entered into before November 1, 2021. In other words, any contracts currently being performed will not be subject to a change in law.
Almost all of the sections of the Construction Remedies Act will come into force on November 1, with some exceptions. Importantly, the provisions which require an owner of a construction project to create a holdback trust account, which could prove to be administratively burdensome to many owners, will not come into force on November 1. It is expected that there will be changes made to the regulations and that these sections will come into force on a later date.
The regulations, which are now available online here, prescribe new forms to be used for filings of liens and projects where mandatory surety bonding is required on Crown or local government projects.
What’s next
It could still be several months before the effects of the new legislation are known in practice. Given that the transitional provisions flow with the dates of contracts parties managing several projects should pay careful attention to the dates of those contracts to determine which legislation applies.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about how the information above may affect you, please contact any member of our construction group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Damages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…
Read MoreGrant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…
Read MoreRick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…
Read MoreJonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…
Read MoreBruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…
Read More