Skip to content

Pay Transparency: Recent Changes to PEI’s Employment Standards Act

Murray Murphy and Kate Profit

Changes to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) regarding pay transparency received royal assent on November 17, 2021 and has recently come into force as of June 1, 2022.

 

Pay History

 

Under these amendments, employers are prevented from seeking pay history information from applicants, whether directly or indirectly. This does not prevent an applicant from voluntarily disclosing their pay history information without prompting from the employer. When such information is provided by an applicant, an employer is entitled to rely on such information when determining pay for the applicant.

 

Employers are still able to seek information about pay ranges or aggregate pay provided for comparable positions for which the applicant is applying.

 

Pay Range Information

 

Employer’s who publicly advertise a job to the general public must include information about the expected pay or pay range for the posted position. “Publicly advertised job positing” is defined as:

 

an external job posting for a specific job that an employer advertises to the general public in any manner, but for greater certainty does not include recruitment campaigns, general help wanted signs or positions that are only advertised to existing employees of the employer

 

Anti-Reprisal

 

The amendments provide safeguards to allow employees to seek information from the employer and share pay information in the workplace without fear of reprisal. Specifically, employers are prevented from intimidating, dismissing, or otherwise penalizing an employee (or threatening to do so) when an employee:

 

  • Makes inquiries about pay or requests information on the employer’s pay policies;
  • Discloses pay information to another employee;
  • Provides information regarding the employer’s compliance or non-compliance; or
  • Asks the employer to comply with pay history, pay transparency, or anti-reprisal provisions.

 

Application

 

These changes will apply to all non-unionized workplaces. However, some changes will not apply to those governed by a collective agreement.

 

Subsection 2(4) of the ESA sets out that only certain provisions of the ESA are applicable to employees whose terms and conditions are established by a collective agreement pursuant to the Labour Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. L-1.

 

Pay transparency provisions span sections 5.8 (pay history), 5.9 (pay range information), and 5.10 (anti-reprisal) of the ESA, however, it is only section 5.10 that will apply to unionized workplaces.

 

Key Takeaways

 

Pay transparency amendments will likely result in changes to employer’s hiring practices, including what questions they ask and what information is offered to the applicant. Namely, these changes will require many employers to share pay information (being either expected pay or a pay range) when jobs are posted publicly.

 


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Client Update: Perrin v Blake reaffirms the law on contributory negligence and recovery of damages

April 14, 2016

In a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…

Read More

Client Update: Interest arbitration changes for New Brunswick postponed for further study

April 11, 2016

On Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top