Skip to content

Upcoming removal of pre-travel COVID-19 test requirement for fully vaccinated travellers

Brendan Sheridan

The government of Canada is taking another step to reduce the pre-travel requirements for fully vaccinated travellers when entering the country. It has been announced that as of April 1, 2022 fully vaccinated travellers will no longer need to undergo a pre-arrival COVID-19 test.

As noted in the news release, the removal of the pre-travel COVID-19 test requirement for fully vaccinated travellers will be coming into force as of April 1, 2022 at 12:01 a.m. EST. This is another step in the phased approach the government has taken in loosening the travel restrictions. This phased approach began on February 28, 2022 in recognition that the country is now living with COVID-19 and has passed the peak of the Omicron outbreak.

The pre-travel COVID-19 test requirement has been in place for well over a year as it was initially brought into effect on January 7, 2021. This requirement began to be loosened as of February 28, 2022 when travellers were provided with the option of using a COVID-19 rapid antigen test result or a molecular test result to meet pre-entry requirements. The current announcement is now eliminating the need for any pre-travel COVID-19 test as of April 1, 2022 for fully vaccinated travellers.

Unvaccinated travellers who are eligible to enter Canada will still need to provide an accepted pre-entry COVID-19 test result after April 1, 2022. The acceptable pre-entry COVID-19 test results for unvaccinated travellers includes:

  • A valid professionally administered or observed negative antigen test taken outside of Canada no more than 1 day before your scheduled flight or entry to Canada. This test must have been observed or administered by an accredited lab or testing provider;
  • A valid negative molecular test taken outside of Canada within 72 hours of your flight’s scheduled departure time to Canada or your arrival at the land border or marine port of entry;
  • A previous positive molecular test taken at least 10 calendar days and no more than 180 calendar days before your initially scheduled flight’s departure time to Canada or your arrival at the land border or marine port of entry. Positive antigen test results will not be accepted to meet this requirement. You must also no longer have symptoms of COVID-19 when travelling.

The upcoming removal of the COVID-19 pre-travel entry requirement for fully vaccinated travellers will likely be a welcome reprieve for many. This will not only provide more flexibility in planning travel and remove the stress associated with scheduling pre-travel COVID-19 tests within set periods of time prior to travel to Canada, but it will also likely result in savings to those who have travelled outside of Canada as COVID-19 tests can be quite expensive.

While Canada is continuing to loosen the travel restriction requirements, we have seen the country revert to more stringent restrictions when outbreaks are expected to occur so it is important to remain up to date on the requirements when you are travelling.

Our immigration group would be pleased to advise on these travel requirements.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Immigration group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top