Skip to content

Thought Leadership

Canada 2024 Federal Budget paves the way for Open Banking

April 22, 2024

By Kevin Landry

On April 15, 2024, the Canadian federal budget was released. Connected to the budget was an explanation of the framework for Canada’s proposed implementation of Open Banking (sometimes called consumer-driven banking).

This follows several other recent developments in the fintech and payments space in Canada, such as the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, and the Retail Payments Activities Act.[1]

Background

In March 2022, the Federal Government named Abraham Tachjian as the Open Banking lead, and was mandated to develop a “made in Canada” regime based on the recommendations in the final report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking.

 

What was revealed about the expected open banking framework?

Governance

The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (“FCAC”) will have an expanded mandate that includes oversight of Open Banking and responsibility for establishing foundational framework elements. The Department of Finance will retain its role in respect of policy and legislative or regulatory development.

Next steps- legislation

The government will introduce one or more pieces of legislation in spring of 2024 to implement the Open Banking framework. These statutes are expected to outline key elements, such as governance, scope, criteria, and process for the technical standard. Remaining elements of the framework will be legislated in fall of 2024.

Framework rules are expected to avoid creating duplicative or potentially conflicting requirements with existing legislation.

Multi-stage implementation

In the initial phase of implementation, the government will mandate participation for Canada’s largest banks and allow opt-in participation for other financial institutions desiring to participate (such as fintechs) and provincially regulated organizations like credit unions.

What data can be shared?

Data related to chequing and savings accounts operations, investment products available through their online portals, and lending products – such as credit cards, lines of credit, and mortgages – will be shareable in the initial phase.

Importantly for many participants, data that has been materially enhanced such that it offers the participant “significant additional value or insight” will not be required to be shared, which will protect many participants’ market advantage.

Standing prohibitions on the sharing of customer information for the business of insurance will remain in force.

How will data be shared?

Once allowed to access the framework, all accredited participants, when authorized by a consumer, are required to share consumers in-scope data in its unaltered, original format, free of charge, with other participants. This will be a requirement for continued participation in the framework.

Accreditation

The framework will set out specific criteria for data requestors to access consumer financial data. A list of all authorized participants will be publicly available in a central registry for transparency.

Participants will need to apply to the FCAC with information on their organization, operational standards, and financial capacity. Mandatory reporting of key information will be required to maintain accreditation.

Privacy

Although participants in the framework will continue to be required to comply with existing privacy legislation, additional privacy rules for financial data sharing will be introduced.

Some interesting features outlined in the disclosure are that participants will be required to “reconfirm” consent from consumers at regular intervals, and provide dashboards to ensure consumers have real-time knowledge of who has access to their data; the type of data they share; the accounts where the data is collected; what consents are granted and how to revoke them.

Liability to flow with the data

The framework establishes a statutory relationship between participants, eliminating the need for cumbersome bilateral contracts between participants for data sharing.

This expected liability structure will move liability with the data and place it with the party who is in control of the data, if anything goes wrong.

Any data provider’s liability toward a consumer for how the data is managed or protected ceases once it leaves the institution but the data provider maintains liability toward the consumer for data under its control.

Security

The legislation will establish the baseline security requirements for all participants to protect consumer data. Participants will also be required to complete ongoing reporting obligations and surveillance audits.

National security and the integrity of the financial system

The Minister of Finance will have authorities to refuse, suspend, or revoke access to the framework for national security-related reasons.

Single technical standard

Open Banking will move Canada’s fintech sector away from screen scraping to the use of application programming interfaces (APIs), enabling different products and services to communicate in a consistent manner.

To align with international best practices, the government will mandate the use of a single technical standard.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


[1] Stewart McKelvey had previously written about these herehere and here

 

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top