Thought Leadership
By Kevin Landry
On April 15, 2024, the Canadian federal budget was released. Connected to the budget was an explanation of the framework for Canada’s proposed implementation of Open Banking (sometimes called consumer-driven banking).
This follows several other recent developments in the fintech and payments space in Canada, such as the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, and the Retail Payments Activities Act.[1]
Background
In March 2022, the Federal Government named Abraham Tachjian as the Open Banking lead, and was mandated to develop a “made in Canada” regime based on the recommendations in the final report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking.
What was revealed about the expected open banking framework?
Governance
The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (“FCAC”) will have an expanded mandate that includes oversight of Open Banking and responsibility for establishing foundational framework elements. The Department of Finance will retain its role in respect of policy and legislative or regulatory development.
Next steps- legislation
The government will introduce one or more pieces of legislation in spring of 2024 to implement the Open Banking framework. These statutes are expected to outline key elements, such as governance, scope, criteria, and process for the technical standard. Remaining elements of the framework will be legislated in fall of 2024.
Framework rules are expected to avoid creating duplicative or potentially conflicting requirements with existing legislation.
Multi-stage implementation
In the initial phase of implementation, the government will mandate participation for Canada’s largest banks and allow opt-in participation for other financial institutions desiring to participate (such as fintechs) and provincially regulated organizations like credit unions.
What data can be shared?
Data related to chequing and savings accounts operations, investment products available through their online portals, and lending products – such as credit cards, lines of credit, and mortgages – will be shareable in the initial phase.
Importantly for many participants, data that has been materially enhanced such that it offers the participant “significant additional value or insight” will not be required to be shared, which will protect many participants’ market advantage.
Standing prohibitions on the sharing of customer information for the business of insurance will remain in force.
How will data be shared?
Once allowed to access the framework, all accredited participants, when authorized by a consumer, are required to share consumers in-scope data in its unaltered, original format, free of charge, with other participants. This will be a requirement for continued participation in the framework.
Accreditation
The framework will set out specific criteria for data requestors to access consumer financial data. A list of all authorized participants will be publicly available in a central registry for transparency.
Participants will need to apply to the FCAC with information on their organization, operational standards, and financial capacity. Mandatory reporting of key information will be required to maintain accreditation.
Privacy
Although participants in the framework will continue to be required to comply with existing privacy legislation, additional privacy rules for financial data sharing will be introduced.
Some interesting features outlined in the disclosure are that participants will be required to “reconfirm” consent from consumers at regular intervals, and provide dashboards to ensure consumers have real-time knowledge of who has access to their data; the type of data they share; the accounts where the data is collected; what consents are granted and how to revoke them.
Liability to flow with the data
The framework establishes a statutory relationship between participants, eliminating the need for cumbersome bilateral contracts between participants for data sharing.
This expected liability structure will move liability with the data and place it with the party who is in control of the data, if anything goes wrong.
Any data provider’s liability toward a consumer for how the data is managed or protected ceases once it leaves the institution but the data provider maintains liability toward the consumer for data under its control.
Security
The legislation will establish the baseline security requirements for all participants to protect consumer data. Participants will also be required to complete ongoing reporting obligations and surveillance audits.
National security and the integrity of the financial system
The Minister of Finance will have authorities to refuse, suspend, or revoke access to the framework for national security-related reasons.
Single technical standard
Open Banking will move Canada’s fintech sector away from screen scraping to the use of application programming interfaces (APIs), enabling different products and services to communicate in a consistent manner.
To align with international best practices, the government will mandate the use of a single technical standard.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
[1] Stewart McKelvey had previously written about these here, here and here
Archive
On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…
Read MoreOn April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…
Read MoreIn May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…
Read MoreOn May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…
Read MoreBy Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…
Read MoreIn a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…
Read MoreOn Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…
Read More