Skip to content

Proposed amendments to Cannabis Regulations make it easier to be green

Kevin Landry and Nikolas Shymko

Health Canada has recently proposed a number of amendments to the Cannabis Regulations and other regulations concerning cannabis research and testing, and cannabis beverages. Until April 25, 2022, Health Canada will be accepting comments on the proposed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Concerning Cannabis Research and Testing and Cannabis Beverages and Order to Amend Schedule 3 published in Canada Gazette, Part I on March 12, 2022.

The proposed amendments are as follows:

(1) Non-therapeutic research on cannabis permitted

Proposed amendments to the Cannabis Exemption (Food and Drugs Act) Regulations would create an exemption from the application of the Food and Drugs Act for certain non-therapeutic research on cannabis.

Non-therapeutic research on cannabis includes research involving the distribution of cannabis to human participants subject to certain exceptions, including: research related to the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of a disease, disorder or abnormal physical state or its symptoms.

Non-therapeutic research would exclude any research involving the participation of young persons.

(2) Reference standards and test kits

Currently, only licensed processors are able to sell reference standards and produce test kits, which potentially limits their availability and variety.

Proposed amendments would authorize analytical testers and government laboratories to produce, distribute, and sell reference standards, as well as to produce test kits.

(3) Head of laboratory

Proposed amendments to the Cannabis Regulations would alter the qualifications required for a person to become head of laboratory. It would expand the eligible credentials to include a diploma, certificate or credential from a Canadian post-secondary educational institution in a field or occupation relevant to the duties of the head of laboratory position. It would also expand the recognition of international credentials for this position. The proposed amendments would permit accepting equivalency assessments issued by organizations or institutions designated by Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada or recognized by a province.

(4) Cannabis beverages

The Cannabis Act currently sets a public possession limit of 30 grams of dried cannabis or its “equivalent” for other forms of cannabis as established pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Cannabis Act.

Proposed amendments will create two new classes of cannabis, namely: cannabis beverages and non-solids containing cannabis, other than beverages. This amendment would increase the equivalency for cannabis beverages to 570 grams, as opposed to the current 70 grams. As a result, the amount of cannabis beverages that an adult could possess in public would be equivalent to 48 standard-sized beverage cans (48 × 355 mL cans).

To reduce the impact of these changes on the industry, the proposed regulations would provide a 12-month transition period allowing all licence holders and persons authorized to distribute or sell edible cannabis products to distribute or sell cannabis beverages that have been packaged and labelled in accordance with the current requirements under the Cannabis Act and Cannabis Regulations. Following the transition period, all cannabis beverages distributed and sold by holders of a licence for processing would be required to include a public possession limit statement that is reflective of this proposed amendment, whilst other authorized persons could continue to sell previously labelled and packaged products to sell or distribute their existing inventory of these products.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Cannabis group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top