Skip to content

Proposed amendments to Cannabis Regulations make it easier to be green

Kevin Landry and Nikolas Shymko

Health Canada has recently proposed a number of amendments to the Cannabis Regulations and other regulations concerning cannabis research and testing, and cannabis beverages. Until April 25, 2022, Health Canada will be accepting comments on the proposed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Concerning Cannabis Research and Testing and Cannabis Beverages and Order to Amend Schedule 3 published in Canada Gazette, Part I on March 12, 2022.

The proposed amendments are as follows:

(1) Non-therapeutic research on cannabis permitted

Proposed amendments to the Cannabis Exemption (Food and Drugs Act) Regulations would create an exemption from the application of the Food and Drugs Act for certain non-therapeutic research on cannabis.

Non-therapeutic research on cannabis includes research involving the distribution of cannabis to human participants subject to certain exceptions, including: research related to the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of a disease, disorder or abnormal physical state or its symptoms.

Non-therapeutic research would exclude any research involving the participation of young persons.

(2) Reference standards and test kits

Currently, only licensed processors are able to sell reference standards and produce test kits, which potentially limits their availability and variety.

Proposed amendments would authorize analytical testers and government laboratories to produce, distribute, and sell reference standards, as well as to produce test kits.

(3) Head of laboratory

Proposed amendments to the Cannabis Regulations would alter the qualifications required for a person to become head of laboratory. It would expand the eligible credentials to include a diploma, certificate or credential from a Canadian post-secondary educational institution in a field or occupation relevant to the duties of the head of laboratory position. It would also expand the recognition of international credentials for this position. The proposed amendments would permit accepting equivalency assessments issued by organizations or institutions designated by Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada or recognized by a province.

(4) Cannabis beverages

The Cannabis Act currently sets a public possession limit of 30 grams of dried cannabis or its “equivalent” for other forms of cannabis as established pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Cannabis Act.

Proposed amendments will create two new classes of cannabis, namely: cannabis beverages and non-solids containing cannabis, other than beverages. This amendment would increase the equivalency for cannabis beverages to 570 grams, as opposed to the current 70 grams. As a result, the amount of cannabis beverages that an adult could possess in public would be equivalent to 48 standard-sized beverage cans (48 × 355 mL cans).

To reduce the impact of these changes on the industry, the proposed regulations would provide a 12-month transition period allowing all licence holders and persons authorized to distribute or sell edible cannabis products to distribute or sell cannabis beverages that have been packaged and labelled in accordance with the current requirements under the Cannabis Act and Cannabis Regulations. Following the transition period, all cannabis beverages distributed and sold by holders of a licence for processing would be required to include a public possession limit statement that is reflective of this proposed amendment, whilst other authorized persons could continue to sell previously labelled and packaged products to sell or distribute their existing inventory of these products.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Cannabis group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

July 7, 2016

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed. A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf…

Read More

Copyright does not monopolize facts – documentary filmmakers’ claim against book author and publisher fails

June 29, 2016

In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…

Read More

Solicitor-client privilege vs the Canada Revenue Agency: the SCC speaks

June 10, 2016

By Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…

Read More

Why can’t we be friends?: Lessons on corporate dissolution from Smith v. Hillier

May 30, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…

Read More

Client Update: Supreme Court of Canada dismisses appeals in punitive damages cases

May 26, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…

Read More

Client Update: Pension update: Countdown to Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans

May 17, 2016

On May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…

Read More

Pension Primer: Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) in Nova Scotia

April 22, 2016

By Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top