Skip to content

Renoviction Ban lifted: the renoviction procedure in Nova Scotia

Brian Tabor, QC, Nico Jones and Hannah Brison

Upon termination of the Renoviction Ban (March 20, 2022), new rules regarding renovictions came into effect.

In summary, these rules require:

  1. The landlord to make an application to the Director of Residential Tenancies (“Director”) for an order that requires the tenant to vacate the premises on a specific date;
  2. the tenant must be given at least three months’ notice;
  3. the repairs or renovations must be so extensive so as to require a building permit and vacant possession; and
  4. the tenant is entitled to compensation based on the size of the residential complex.

The Renoviction Ban has been lifted

On November 25, 2020, a Direction of the Minister, under a declared State of Emergency and pursuant to Section 14 of the Emergency Management Act, S.N.S. 1990, c.8¹ (“Direction”), was issued that prohibited “renovictions” (defined as “a renovation undertaken by a residential landlord to residential premises, or a building containing residential premises, that will require the tenant to vacate the premises”) (“Renoviction Ban”). The Direction provided that the Renoviction Ban would remain in place until the shorter of February 1, 2022 or for the duration of the provincial State of Emergency.

On January 28, 2022, the Renoviction Ban was extended pursuant to another Direction of the Minister², which provided that the Renoviction Ban would remain in place for the duration of the declared State of Emergency. The Renoviction Ban ended when the State of Emergency ended at 11:59 p.m. on March 20, 2022³.

Rules regarding securing vacant possession for renovation purposes

On November 5, 2021, the Residential Tenancies Act, R.S., c. 401 (“Residential Tenancies Act”) was amended to (1) set out the procedure for Renovictions; (2) provide compensation for tenants who agree to, or are ordered by the Director to, terminate a tenancy; and (3) establish a penalty for a landlord that does not comply with the notice and compensation provisions. These new provisions4 took effect immediately following the termination of the Renoviction Ban.

The rules surrounding renovictions are as follows:

  1. There are two permissible ways to terminate a tenancy for demolition, repairs, or renovations5:
    1. Mutual agreement (i.e., the landlord and tenant both agree to end the lease due to a renovation); or
    2. An order of the Director.

If the landlord and tenant mutually agree to end the lease due to a renovation, the agreement must be in writing and must use Form DR5.

  1. If the landlord and tenant do not mutually agree to terminate a tenancy, the landlord may make an application (“Application”) to the Director for an order under Section 17A(e) that terminates the tenancy on a date specified in the order and ordering the tenant to vacate the premises on that date.

The legislation provides that the date must be in not less than three months and not more than 12 months. The Nova Scotia government confirms in their Renovation Fact Sheet that the tenant must be given at least three months’ notice6.

  1. The Application must satisfy the Director that the landlord has all the necessary permits and approvals “required by law” and that the landlord in good faith requires possession of the residential premises for the purpose of: (a) demolition of the residential premises; or (b) making repairs or renovations so extensive so as to require a building permit and vacant possession of the residential premises7.

The Residential Tenancies Act also provides that, in making their decision, the Director will consider the “vacant possession guidelines” prescribed by regulation. There are currently no such guidelines.

  1. If a landlord terminates a tenant’s tenancy pursuant to Section 10AB, the tenant is entitled to compensation equal to the rent payable for8:
    1. the last three months, if the residential complex (defined as a building in which one or more residential premises9 are located) contains more than four residential premises; or
    2. the last month, if the residential complex contains four or fewer residential premises.

Where the tenant continues to reside in the residential premises until the date specified in the agreement or order, they are not required to pay rent to the landlord for the applicable period noted above.

If the landlord provides another unit to the tenant and the tenant agrees to enter into a lease for the new unit with the same benefits and obligations as the current lease, the tenant is not entitled to compensation.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Real Property group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


¹ Direction 20-014
² Direction 22-001
³ New and Important Information for Residential Tenants and Landlords, March 2022: https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/docs/protection-for-renters-information-for-tenants-and- landlords.pdf (“Renovation Fact Sheet”)
4 Found at section 10AB of the Residential Tenancies Act, R.S., c. 401.
5 Residential Tenancies Act, s. 10AB(6).
6 Residential Tenancies Act, s. 10AB(2); ibid note 3.
7 Residential Tenancies Act, s. 10AB(2); ibid note 3.
8 Residential Tenancies Act, s. 10AC(2).
9 Defined as “any house, dwelling, apartment, flat, tenement, manufactured home, land-lease community, manufactured home space or other place that is occupied or may be occupied by an individual as a residence or that part of any such place that is or may be occupied by an individual as a residence.”

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top