Skip to content

The winds of change (part 3): Newfoundland and Labrador releases wind energy guidelines

By: John Samms, Matthew Craig, Dave Randell,  and Jayna Green

On July 26, 2022 the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador (the “Province”) released “Guidelines: Nominating Crown Lands for Wind Energy Projects” (the “Guidelines”). Described as “the first step of certainty,” by Minister Andrew Parsons, this announcement and release of the Guidelines marks a substantial development in renewable energy in the Province. This article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and details the future path ahead for entities looking to invest in wind farm projects in the Province.

Stated Purposes of the Guidelines

The Guidelines explain the evolution of the Province’s wind power policies, mentioning the establishment of the 2007 wind moratorium and the subsequent changes announced on April 5, 2022. For a more detailed description of those rules please see here.

The Guidelines suggest that renewable energy in the Province is abundant, with opportunities to develop green hydrogen and ammonia resources in addition to wind generation. The Guidelines are cited as an initiative to move the Province’s 2021 “Renewable Energy Plan” forward while ensuring long-term benefit to the people of the Province.

While the underlying goals of the Guidelines are important, the Province’s announcement is clear: the time for change has come and those looking to capitalize on the Province’s abundance of renewable resources must act quickly and effectively.

The Nomination and Bid Process Starts Now

Proponents intending to capitalize on wind generation opportunities must hit the ground running. The Province has introduced a two-phased approach to wind generation on Crown Lands and the clock has started ticking.

Phase 1, Calls for Land Nominations, begins immediately and will run until October 1, 2022. Government is asking that interested parties provide nominations for areas within which they wish to develop wind energy projects. At this stage, all Crown lands are available for submission subject to specific exemptions. While respondents are encouraged to be strategic with their nominations, it is evident that the Province is seeking to incentivize proponents and gauge the competition for particular parcels of land. The Government has not limited the amount of land a proponent may show interest in nor are proponents limited to one specific geographic location.

Once Land Nominations are received, they will inform the subsequent decisions made by the Department of Industry, Energy and Technology (“IET”) in selecting land area(s) to be included in future bidding processes. While the Call for Nominations is a non-competitive process, Phase 2, Call for Land Bids, is a competitive process. Details on the evaluation process will be announced in mid-December.

Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro Interfacing

Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro (“NL Hydro”) will be involved in the review of Land Nomination and bid submissions. NL Hydro will be responsible for reviewing the technical viability, and potential rate impacts of assessments. In doing this, NL Hydro may provide insights into the cost of interconnection and supply of energy to respondents where applicable, and will be responsible for providing technical parameters to support respondents as they develop land nominations. In a press conference, the Minister of IET explained that technical viability will be assessed prior to the commencement of the Phase 2 competitive process.

Currently, NL Hydro is conducting wind integration studies to assess the amount of wind generation that can be supported by the grid. The results will be made public, with the goal of ensuring transparency regarding project viability.

NL Hydro will also support project proposals throughout the bidding process by providing reasonable preliminary consultation to proponents and relevant information regarding systems. NL Hydro will not be performing individual system studies for proponents, rather it will initiate detailed system studies for successful bidders through it’s Interconnection Process.[1]

NL Hydro’s involvement will not stop here, as it’s currently involved in a “Reliability and Resource Adequacy Review” to “ensure sufficient and reliable long-term supply of energy and capacity for customers.” The results of the review will influence the number and location of new wind resources, with the final report submitted to the Public Utilities Board on September 30, 2022.

Conclusion

The Province is no stranger to natural resource development. A recent feasibility study of hydrogen production, storage, distribution, and use in the Province estimated that development of hydrogen production in the Province and attraction in new industry could result in new green jobs and a hydrogen sector valued at more than $11 billion per year by 2050. That same study found that if Atlantic Canada captured 5% of the European market for hydrogen, the export opportunity could be $9 billion annually in the Province. While questions remain, a new industry is upon us.

Now publicly described as being a global “best in class resource,” with respect to wind energy, the Province’s opportunity to demonstrate leadership in the global transition to green energy is upon us and navigating a new industry means having the knowledge and support to foster success. Lawyers within Stewart McKelvey’s Energy Group have the expertise to provide this support, and to help clients navigate this novel process, as well as the policy changes to come.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have any questions on the above we would invite you to contact the authors or any other member of our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


[1] The policy states that the Interconnection Process will begin by proponents submitting a formal interconnection request. Hydro will conduct system impact and facilities studies to confirm costs for proponents and previous preliminary system upgrade requirements. NL Hydro’s interconnection process will be executed in an effort to provide proponents with accurate cost estimates and schedules sufficient to support interconnection and power purchase agreement negotiation and regulatory approval.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top