Skip to content

The winds of change (part 3): Newfoundland and Labrador releases wind energy guidelines

By: John Samms, Matthew Craig, Dave Randell,  and Jayna Green

On July 26, 2022 the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador (the “Province”) released “Guidelines: Nominating Crown Lands for Wind Energy Projects” (the “Guidelines”). Described as “the first step of certainty,” by Minister Andrew Parsons, this announcement and release of the Guidelines marks a substantial development in renewable energy in the Province. This article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and details the future path ahead for entities looking to invest in wind farm projects in the Province.

Stated Purposes of the Guidelines

The Guidelines explain the evolution of the Province’s wind power policies, mentioning the establishment of the 2007 wind moratorium and the subsequent changes announced on April 5, 2022. For a more detailed description of those rules please see here.

The Guidelines suggest that renewable energy in the Province is abundant, with opportunities to develop green hydrogen and ammonia resources in addition to wind generation. The Guidelines are cited as an initiative to move the Province’s 2021 “Renewable Energy Plan” forward while ensuring long-term benefit to the people of the Province.

While the underlying goals of the Guidelines are important, the Province’s announcement is clear: the time for change has come and those looking to capitalize on the Province’s abundance of renewable resources must act quickly and effectively.

The Nomination and Bid Process Starts Now

Proponents intending to capitalize on wind generation opportunities must hit the ground running. The Province has introduced a two-phased approach to wind generation on Crown Lands and the clock has started ticking.

Phase 1, Calls for Land Nominations, begins immediately and will run until October 1, 2022. Government is asking that interested parties provide nominations for areas within which they wish to develop wind energy projects. At this stage, all Crown lands are available for submission subject to specific exemptions. While respondents are encouraged to be strategic with their nominations, it is evident that the Province is seeking to incentivize proponents and gauge the competition for particular parcels of land. The Government has not limited the amount of land a proponent may show interest in nor are proponents limited to one specific geographic location.

Once Land Nominations are received, they will inform the subsequent decisions made by the Department of Industry, Energy and Technology (“IET”) in selecting land area(s) to be included in future bidding processes. While the Call for Nominations is a non-competitive process, Phase 2, Call for Land Bids, is a competitive process. Details on the evaluation process will be announced in mid-December.

Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro Interfacing

Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro (“NL Hydro”) will be involved in the review of Land Nomination and bid submissions. NL Hydro will be responsible for reviewing the technical viability, and potential rate impacts of assessments. In doing this, NL Hydro may provide insights into the cost of interconnection and supply of energy to respondents where applicable, and will be responsible for providing technical parameters to support respondents as they develop land nominations. In a press conference, the Minister of IET explained that technical viability will be assessed prior to the commencement of the Phase 2 competitive process.

Currently, NL Hydro is conducting wind integration studies to assess the amount of wind generation that can be supported by the grid. The results will be made public, with the goal of ensuring transparency regarding project viability.

NL Hydro will also support project proposals throughout the bidding process by providing reasonable preliminary consultation to proponents and relevant information regarding systems. NL Hydro will not be performing individual system studies for proponents, rather it will initiate detailed system studies for successful bidders through it’s Interconnection Process.[1]

NL Hydro’s involvement will not stop here, as it’s currently involved in a “Reliability and Resource Adequacy Review” to “ensure sufficient and reliable long-term supply of energy and capacity for customers.” The results of the review will influence the number and location of new wind resources, with the final report submitted to the Public Utilities Board on September 30, 2022.

Conclusion

The Province is no stranger to natural resource development. A recent feasibility study of hydrogen production, storage, distribution, and use in the Province estimated that development of hydrogen production in the Province and attraction in new industry could result in new green jobs and a hydrogen sector valued at more than $11 billion per year by 2050. That same study found that if Atlantic Canada captured 5% of the European market for hydrogen, the export opportunity could be $9 billion annually in the Province. While questions remain, a new industry is upon us.

Now publicly described as being a global “best in class resource,” with respect to wind energy, the Province’s opportunity to demonstrate leadership in the global transition to green energy is upon us and navigating a new industry means having the knowledge and support to foster success. Lawyers within Stewart McKelvey’s Energy Group have the expertise to provide this support, and to help clients navigate this novel process, as well as the policy changes to come.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have any questions on the above we would invite you to contact the authors or any other member of our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


[1] The policy states that the Interconnection Process will begin by proponents submitting a formal interconnection request. Hydro will conduct system impact and facilities studies to confirm costs for proponents and previous preliminary system upgrade requirements. NL Hydro’s interconnection process will be executed in an effort to provide proponents with accurate cost estimates and schedules sufficient to support interconnection and power purchase agreement negotiation and regulatory approval.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Damages for minor injuries in Nova Scotia: a new case on the new cap

April 20, 2017

Damages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…

Read More

The Latest in Employment Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – “You gotta have (good) faith” … Terminating without notice during the probationary period

April 19, 2017

Grant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…

Read More

Municipality liable for failing to ensure visitor was reasonably safe in Municipal Public Park

April 19, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…

Read More

TTC’s Random Testing Decision: A Bright Light for Employers in the Haze of Marijuana Legalization

April 11, 2017

Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…

Read More

Unionization in the Construction Industry: Vacation Day + Snapshot Rule = Disenfranchisement

April 4, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…

Read More

Sometimes a bad deal is just a bad deal: unconscionability and insurance claim settlements in Downer v Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13

March 16, 2017

Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…

Read More

Privilege Prevails: Privacy Commissioner protects solicitor-client communications

March 16, 2017

Jonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Nova Scotia Teachers Union & Government – a synopsis

March 7, 2017

Peter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…

Read More

Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong: The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador weighs in on the former client rule in commercial transactions

March 1, 2017

Bruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…

Read More

The Ordinary Meaning of Insurance: Client Update on the SCC’s Decision in Sabean

February 21, 2017

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top